• Corroded@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Dollar stores. A lot of the time they are profiting by selling you a smaller quantity at a slightly lower price. They target low income communities.

  • TARgz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Your ISP is suddenly asking for more money. What are you gonna do? Disconnect from the internet?

  • unscholarly_source@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    My personal top 3:

    • insurance
    • subscriptions
    • Google and similar data hungry companies (while not a financial scam but moreso a privacy scam, companies like Google and Meta profiteering on our personal data without our knowledge or awareness)
    • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Technically insurance only works if everybody pays in. Wouldn’t work as a concept if every tom dick and harry could pay them $100 then a week later need $100,000. They’d basically be out of business right quick with nothing to provide for anyone. Maybe as some believe it should just be provided through taxes, but it’s certainly not a scam.

      • PoopingCough@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        The scam part comes when you are forced to fight tooth and nail to get money from them even when you are clearly covered

      • Changetheview@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s true insurance companies need to take in adequate premiums in order to have the money the money to pay claims. And when done in balance, insurance is a great thing. Not all insurance in a scam, no doubting that.

        But the current state of insurance, especially health insurance in the US, shows that these companies are making massive profits. How does this happen? Literally one way: They take in more premiums than they pay out in coverage. How? By either knowingly overcharging people or skirting out of paying covered claims through other means (such as baseless rejections).

        That’s the problem with the entire insurance industry and why it must be properly regulated in any industry: It is a race to the bottom. The worse the insurer treats the people that buy insurance from them, the better the company does financially (charge a lot, pay out a little). Mix in the fact that (1) you cannot shop around at the time you need a claim and (2) the contracts are so intensive only a sophisticated legal team can interpret them, and it’s a recipe for disaster.

        So you’re right that all insurance isn’t necessarily a scam. But if you can’t see that the US health insurance industry raking in profits shows serious dysfunction that could be considered a scam, it’s worth taking a second look.

        • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Nobody works for free. In order to be a large effective and not out of business business you need to have a profit to cover overhead like staff.

          • Changetheview@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Did someone say people should work for free? No where am I saying that. Massive profits are not necessary to cover overhead - expenses like overheard and salaries are paid for by revenue - what’s leftover is profit.

            This thread is about whether the current US healthcare insurance industry is a scam or not. Scam means “a dishonest scheme” and insurance saying it’s going to provide healthcare coverage but actually just takes your money, doesn’t provide coverage, and only pays investors/executives could be considered a dishonest scheme by many.

            Insurance companies have a natural tendency to become worse and worse over time. This is called the race to the bottom and is an incredibly well-known phenomena in insurance. Like monopolies, insurance is one of the rare situations where experts are in damn-near universal agreement that heavy regulation is necessary.

            Right now, insurance companies are objectively very bad to the people they provide coverage for. This isn’t an opinion, this is a fact that’s easily verified and well understood. They are not being effectively regulated and as such, are racing to the bottom by providing absolutely terrible coverage while taking in massive premiums. This is not good for anyone and is not fixed by a free market in any way. You cannot effectively shop for insurance and their behavior is not rectified, unless prohibited by law (regulation).

            • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              I only posted what I did because your post read like you expected insurance to run by paying out 100% of what they get in. The thread started with general insurance but many zeroed in on health insurance. Yes there are problems, obviously, but certain things like denying claims comes about from many people trying to scam payments and the insurers tightening security too much without enough oversight.

              Everybody seems to think there’s huge payments going to investors and C level executives but that comes from market confidence. So the stock price rises and those bonuses of stock options appreciate without the company paying a dime.

              • DeadlineX@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                United Healthcare pulled in $20 BILLION dollars in PROFIT in 2022. The ceo was given $24 million in compensation for that year. Denying claims because of scams? They can afford it.

                • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  How was that compensation structured? Was it cash or stock? And how much money would they spend if they didn’t act paranoid about false claims? Would that dissolve the 80 billion because it’s possible.

                  Aside from that, did you notice this is a 2 month old post?

  • crime [she/her, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Credit scores. It goes up when you have more debt and goes down when you pay your debt off, but it goes down if you ask for a loan and it goes down if you even try to check what it is.

    Absolute nonsense.

    • philluminati@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      For context I’m a Brit.

      I would support a king, if I had a good one. I would hold a man not as equal but as above me, and have him experience and control the country. I would fight and die for that person.

      But only if I got something back as an equal. My King should work tirelessly to improve the lives of their subjects.

      Their majesty should humble capitalists and oppressors and keep them in check.

      King Charles does cut some tape, do some humanitarian PR but frankly it’s clear that people like Bezos run rough shot over him and that’s essentially why I lose my respect.

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Massage school. They say they’re teaching you a trade and will help with job placement but there is a glut of graduates and not enough jobs for them. Yet the school keeps signing up new students because that’s how they make money.