• Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why do people feel this way?

      I’m genuinely curious as I’d think having a wider swathe of coding experience would be a good thing wouldn’t it?

      I don’t work in fields that use coding expertise, I drive a forklift so I’m out of my wheel house when it comes to coding.

      • gornius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Java used to lack many features to make the stuff you wanted it to do, so most Java programmers adapted design patterns to solve these problems.

        Honestly, older versions of Java are utter garbage DX. The only reason it got so popular was because of aggressive enterprise marketing and it worked. How can a language lack such an essential feature as default parameters?

        So, anyway after the great hype Java lost its marketshare, and developers were forced to learn another technologies. And of course, instead of looking for language-native way of solving problems, they just used same design patterns.

        And thus MoveAdapterStrategyFactoryFactories were in places where simple lambda function would do the same thing, just not abstracted away three layers above. Obviously used once in the entire codebase.

        Imo the only really good thing about Java was JVM, while it was not perfect, it actually delivered what it promised.

      • PaperTowel@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Java in a large way has been eclipsed by most other languages, and developers kind of have a way of making fun of old technologies, like a lot of the same jokes are made about PHP which is still very popular but outdated. In reality Java is also still incredibly popular and knowing it is certainly a benefit. It’s just a collective joke.

        • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          NGL if I saw a job listing that said, “Don’t have experience in a specific field,” I wouldn’t apply even if I didn’t have experience in the field specified because my assumptions for why they’d say that basically are the reasons you said.

          Or that they would want someone they could under pay for the position, but that’s more specific for what the job is and what they don’t want you to know beforehand.

          Edit: Fixed wrong wording

  • frobeniusnorm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Ruling Javascript and Python programmers out would be more sane imho. Java sucks, but at least its typed and doesn’t implement weird semantics.

    • seth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      JS -> Typescript, let the transpiler do its job

      Python -> mypy + from typing import blahblah

      ez pz

  • Troy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe they want to avoid java coding patterns. FactoryFactoryGenerator kind of stuff. Maybe they want to teach their own java coding patterns and want someone coming in with a blank slate so they don’t have to unlearn habits. Maybe they’re tired of diploma mill programmers applying and are using this as a resume filter tripwire.

    • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Definitely the first. I work in ML, and I find for instance people with background mainly in c# to be the least fit for my field, particularly if they have long experience. So I understand this kind of requests

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Definitely. Horror story time.

      We had an outside contractor bring us some code once that was thousands of lines of Python to do a very simple job. I was perplexed. I dove in to figure out what the problem was, and somehow I was looking at the most Java-esque Python code I could imagine. What’s worse is that he implemented his own “Java style” property getters and setters for all the Python classes, which obviously aren’t needed because you can simply access properties directly. In the end I took an 80 line snippet of his code (which actually did the work we needed), swapped out all the getters and setters, and deleted all the rest.

      • BaskinRobbins@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can always tell when someone’s been a career contractor because they never adhere to any of the established patterns/styles in the codebase.

        • gribodyr@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I disagree. Good career contractors should learn to write in the code style of the project. And the real pros do.

      • Troy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not to say that python coding habits are the best either – certainly they’re terrible when translating outside of python (most of the time). And even within python, someone who is used to with only the base modules will write it differently than writing PyQt and still completely different than someone doing numpy code… because the styles of coding of the underlying system change your coding mode. Like, my variables are all CamelCase when doing user interfaces with Qt because it makes sense there, stylistically.

      • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is pretty common with outside contractors.

        We just come in, say we’ll pay them x dollars and they give us code that passes the test. But that code will not at all align with any prior patterns.

        I absolutely know I’m guilty of it when I do freelancing. Sorry.