When bad management meets bad software, even great hardware is useless

  • Ugurcan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    To be honest, Windows Phone OS was a marvel in terms of user experience and design language. It was a fresh breath on interacting and utilizing the new always online world.

    Calling it ‘Bad Software’ is not fair at all.

    Too bad MS picked every possible bad decision to cripple it, starting with not putting it’s weight behind the OS at all.

    I really, really miss the feeling of being in control of my whole digital existence with just a single glance.

    • Zoldyck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Exacty. The Lumia 925 was so fucking good, and streets ahead of competitors, especially for the price. The camera on that phone made pics that is still better than some phone cameras today, from models that cost double or more!

  • Fake4000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Honestly it was a bad call on Nokia to switch to windows. They would have been in a different place of they capitalised on their market share and switched to android.

    • Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Nokia should have continued developing the Linux Qt system maemo/meego. I was working with it as subcontractor in Nokia, and it was awesome. The Qt/C++ was really fast to code, and you could basically port KDE apps into it with small effort.

      If they would have continued with it, we could have had three major OS in phones.

      I was leading architect in internal UI design tools, and the tools had features that android/apple toolsets not even now have. Mainly because you could run the Qt app with PC hardware without any emulation.