• airglow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Based on the statements Google previously made, Google most likely sent a check for a fraction of the damages that a jury could find them liable for.

    It’s unclear just how big the check was. The court filing redacted key figures to protect Google’s trade secrets. But Google claimed that testimony from US experts “shrank” the damages estimate “considerably” from initial estimates between $100 million and $300 million, suggesting that the current damages estimate is “substantially less” than what the US has paid so far in expert fees to reach those estimates.

    According to Reuters, Google has not disclosed “the size of its payment” but has said that “after months of discovery, the Justice Department could only point to estimated damages of less than $1 million.”

    A fine of less than $1 million is absolutely not what anyone except Google is asking for.

    • kirklennon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      A fine of less than $1 million is absolutely not what anyone except Google is asking for.

      The DOJ can really only ask for treble damages. If Google paid ~$3 million, that’s realistically as good as the DOJ was going to get. It sounds like the initial estimates were just way off. Nobody should be shocked that the inept antitrust division screwed up again. They’re going after big, buzz-worthy names without the facts or law to actually back it up.

      • airglow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Only Google is claiming that the damages are less than $1 million. You’re taking Google’s self-interested claim as fact while overlooking Google’s financial motivation to pay less than what they owe, which a jury could find to be in the hundreds of millions. For obvious reasons, court judgments aren’t decided by the defendants.