• IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Tell me you are desperately searching Google for ammo without saying a word.

    The links there have nothing to do with changing policy or not being upfront. The children thing is about MS missing alerts to parents over changes to specific property charges. It’s not like they didn’t even have alerts, just not for these properties. Real fucking evil right?

    All of these legal challenge are on the implementation not MS lying to you in the ToS. They used both of these services as documentated.

    So again, show me a case where MS lied about what is collected and not this desperate unrelated bullshit. MS isn’t lying about how they are using your data.

    • sinonat@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Oh boy. Do I need to crack open the case from 2018 where a Dutch team found out that Microsoft was collecting data WITHOUT stating it in the ToS.

      https://www.theregister.com/2018/11/16/microsoft_gdpr

      Also: Even when stuff is written in the ToS it can still be illegal. (According to European law) Microsoft has broken GDPR laws in the past and will continue to do so. Whether it is written in the ToS or not.

      (PS: I am not using the data hog google either) (PS: it is called “researching”. Not " desperately searching for ammo")