Jenoki@lemmy.ml to Piracy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoThis is the waylemmy.mlimagemessage-square16linkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageThis is the waylemmy.mlJenoki@lemmy.ml to Piracy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square16linkfedilink
minus-squarelittleblue✨@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoBecause 200% should be your minimum, not your max. 🤌🏼
minus-squareRustmilian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-21 year agoIf there’s no one left to seed, the torrent dies. Seeding back at least 200% ensures the torrent stays healthy.
minus-squareZeroEcks@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoSometimes you need to seed back more than 200% because the other two people might not be able to seed it back. I would generally not set a limit
minus-squareRustmilian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-21 year agoTrue, but as a minimum you should be doing 200%. Also in a ideal scenario that 200% would be spread out to a lot more people then just 2.
minus-squarelittleblue✨@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoOP is showing 200% as their maximum. That’s the whole point of this thread. 🤌🏼
Dumb question, why?
Because 200% should be your minimum, not your max. 🤌🏼
If there’s no one left to seed, the torrent dies. Seeding back at least 200% ensures the torrent stays healthy.
Sometimes you need to seed back more than 200% because the other two people might not be able to seed it back. I would generally not set a limit
True, but as a minimum you should be doing 200%.
Also in a ideal scenario that 200% would be spread out to a lot more people then just 2.
OP is showing 200% as their maximum. That’s the whole point of this thread. 🤌🏼