Humans.
(Yes i am a Misanthrope)
you could start with yourself
That would be only one less hunans.He can do better if he puts his back into it.
Not cool. Do not incite suicide.
I can excuse genocide incitement, but I draw the line at suicide incitement.I don’t excuse genocide incitement, that is inexcusable. But nobody was doing that, so. 👍
true, that fucker was inciting omnicide, which is even worse. why do vile ecofascists like you always do lip service to the fact that the statement “the world would be better without [insert ethnic group]” is evil but are suddenly ok with the prospect of murdering even more people? absolutely disgusting ideology of yours.
They weren’t inciting anything. They were just answering the question of what the world would be better off without.
They aren’t saying humans should actually be murdered. It is hard to deny the fact that we as a human race do nothing but exploit nature right now, rather than coexist with it. That is what is being said. Not that “we should kill all humans”. That’s reading too much into it, just like you are reading way too much into what I’m supposedly insinuating (i.e. “murdering even more people”, which makes no sense because nobody was talking about murdering anybody lol).
Relax. I have not expressed anything that you can derive an ideology from. So you should not get your debate-trigger-happy panties in a twist over anything that’s being said here. It’s an objective, truthful answer to OP’s question.
I’m not saying anybody should die. The commenter is not saying anybody should die. You aren’t saying anybody should die, right?
All good? 🤝
Define “the world”.
Are we talking about the actual ball of rock? The collective ecology of organisms living on it? Or specifically the human race’s existence on the rock and within the ecology?
If we narrow it down to all organic life on the planet, the answer is: humans.
humans are part of the organic life on this planet (and since recently even outside) and your proposal would be pretty bad for them. fuck off ecofash
You’re right, that it would be bad for humans. I’m just looking at the big picture and what would good for it in the long run.
Humans already make similar decisions anyway. Certain part of the population will suffer so that another one can benefit. Occasionally, these sorts of decisions also lead to deaths. In an even larger scale, humans have also decided that certain animals and plants can suffer so that humans may thrive. Imagine if the ecosystem as a whole could make a decision like this about itself. Do you think the it would keep humanity, remove it entirely or maybe trim it down a bit?
But seriously though, humans are here to stay for the time being, and I prefer to keep it that way. Unlike Linkola, I’m in no hurry to see disasters wipe out a portion of humanity.
so you realize that the problem isnt within humanity itself, but class division. those classes a social construct and can be overcome. join your local radical leftist organization, read theory and start fighting for a better world not only for humanity but for the rest of life as well.
What kind of theory do you recommend?
as a ml its firstly gonna be the obvious ones: marx, engels and lenin. marx style can be a little hard to read sometimes, but it will make you see the world with new eyes truly. i genuinely recommend this reading list.
hey thanks it’s my list 😀
Communism
I don’t know why this is getting downvoted. Communism is a pretty bad thing.
Maybe one or two more genocides/famines and then they might relise.
Meanwhile, in Israel…
the us
israel
the west in general
liberalism
the bourgeoisie
what has that to do with what i said? or are just another fascist drooling about endangered civilians due to them having the “wrong” ethnicity?
edit: statement was based on an misunderstanding, see below
Earthquakes
