• Rusty Shackleford@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    the paradox of thrift holds that collective thrift may be bad for the economy.

    Collective thrift is great for the economy. It’s just bad for corporate parasitism, economic stagnation, and cataclysmic wealth imbalance.

    It renders parasitic business models as unviable and allows for the rebalancing of resources and development capital towards products that provide actual meaningful value for the vast majority of people.

    • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      No, it’s bad. It creates a deflationary spiral that kills all kinds of businesses. Japan’s economy has been fucked for decades by low growth because of deflation.

      If people don’t spend money, companies fire workers. Then people spend less money because they have no jobs. So companies fire even more workers. Thrift is bad in aggregate.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I like to remind people that the last time we had a really bad deflationary recession, it was so bad that we called it a “depression”…

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          The major difference between that and what Japan is experiencing is that The Great Depression was cause by inflationary causes, not deflation, and the US government printing more money wasn’t going to help there. Meanwhile Japan has been printing boatloads of money for decades trying to trigger inflation, and are barely managing to stave off deflation.

          The other major difference is that during The Great Depression, US couples were having children. Japan has been in a population Freefall the entire time.