• Arda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    So what look at that beautiful Phantom Silver S21 Ultra uhjhj

    -send by Silver S21U

  • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 years ago

    If you want the good camera, you need to get the giant version of the phone.

    If you want a phone that fits in human hands, you can only choose from subpar cameras.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      If you want the good camera, you need to get the giant version of the phone.

      Sony Cyber-Shot ?

      If you want a phone that fits in human hands, you can only choose from subpar cameras.

      Because it’s a expensive phone with subpar camera otherwise.

      Also, anything over 33 MP on smartphones is pixel binning – meaning, software and marketing – anyway.

  • UFO@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 years ago

    Making them increasingly difficult to hold (“but design!” They cry) so you “accidently” have to buy a new one again.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 years ago

      I appreciate the feature but despise broadcast radio. It’s definitely silly to have people carry around a gizmo for two-way audio communication, on a surprising variety of wireless frequencies and protocols, and tell them to carry a separate gizmo for a century-old music streaming service that’s in every single modern car.

      • HM King Charles III DG FD@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 years ago

        The century old music streaming service is so fast you can literally set your watch to it. While the same stream digitally has a thirty second delay 🥲

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 years ago

    They’ll take away volume control (SW/HW buttons) and replace with dynamically adjusting “magic volume” so that you can’t mute ads.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 years ago

      Oh Christ. You’ve just triggered a premonition in me–the Galaxy S32 Ultra will be the first smartphone with no physical buttons or ports. You can turn it “off,” but that will only turn on a sort of extreme power saving mode. It will still ping your location once every few minutes, and will keep the fingerprint scanner active. You will “turn on” the device by holding your finger on the fingerprint scanner for four seconds. They will advertise the “quick startup” as a new feature. Volume will be controlled by sliding your finger along the right edge of the phone, which the screen will wrap around all the way to the back. It will be impossible to hold the phone without touching some part of the screen.

      It will only allow wireless charging. You will not be able to connect it directly to a computer. In marketing, this will be to meet rigorous water safety standards. In reality, this will be to prevent you from using ADB to remove apps that come with the phone. You cannot turn off mobile data. You cannot turn off location. You cannot use a third party SMS application. You cannot choose your own wallpaper. You cannot set a private DNS. You cannot install applications that haven’t been approved by Samsung. You cannot block ads. This is all covered on page 74 of subsection 32(a) of section G8 of the terms and conditions that you agreed to when you set up the phone.

      They will meet the physical limitations of how well a small lens can focus light. Zoom will cap out at 150x. Nevertheless, there will be seven cameras.

      • shneancy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 years ago

        nahhh you’ll be able to choose your own wallpaper, the average user will eat up all of those “feautres” but god forbid Keighleeeigh can’t put her little baby Xaileeyn as her screen saver

      • Xanvial@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 years ago

        correction a bit, you can use adb via wifi. That’s what I do to sideload an app to my Android TV

      • moubliezpas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just so you know, this comment is visible on the internet for anyone to see, and has been for 2 years.

        When they actually introduce all these fantastic new features, we will know who to blame for the idea.

      • nicerdicer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 years ago

        You will not be able to connect it directly to a computer. In marketing, this will be to meet rigorous water safety standards.

        Making devices water-proof is also a marketing scheme to avoid replaceable batteries :

        Some manufacturers are already eyeing an exemption for batteries used in “wet conditions” to opt out electric toothbrushes and possibly wearables like earbuds and smartwatches. The exemption is “based on unfounded safety claims,” states Thomas Opsomer, policy engineer for iFixit, in Repair.EU’s post.

        Despite the coming up regulation on batteries and waste batteries by the EU Council batteries in water-proof devices will probably be exempt from being replceable, because the water proof feature of the device cannot be guaranteed. This undermines the right to repair and manufacturers can hope that customers replace their entire devices soon. Making phones water-proof is a loophole to seal off the device so that it is not to be repaired, at least without keeping the water-proof features after repairing.

        • Resonosity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 years ago

          Yeah pretty sure the Fairphone 5 and its predecessors have a pretty good IP rating, despite their ability to have the battery removed.

          • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 years ago

            I dropped several flip phones in water ranging from bath, to sink, to ponds and creeks in the mid 00’s to mid teens before getting a smart phone. Out of probably 10 phones used only one was ever ruined by the water, the rest all dried out fine when taken apart and left to dry for a day or two.

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          I know, right? I mean, does he seriously expect virtually every smartphone manufacturer to put holes in his screen and take away his headphone jacks, removable sim cards, SD cards, replaceable batteries, and IR blasters, and switch to an aspect ratio other than 16:9? That would be ridiculous. They never make user-unfriendly changes!

            • wanderingmagus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 years ago

              And which of the changes he listed would the 95% figure you mentioned care about? By your definition, short of literally turning each feature into a micro transaction, there’s no such thing as user unfriendly changes - and knowing the general public, not even then.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 years ago

    Subscription to the camera on your own phone, capped # of photos per week and only basic adjustment/editing features for the entry tier.

    • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 years ago

      Google is already doing this with their photo editor app. All the new features require a subscription.

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 years ago

    Smartphone manufacturers, if you’re reading this:

    I spent 6 hours on google to find a phone with a screen smaller than 6 inch. I did find none (except an old iPhone, but I want android), so I had to buy one 6 inch. It is too unwieldy. I am annoyed.

    There is a serious market for people like me. Do not look away. Somebody will buy these phones.

    Also, by the way, it’s not bad if the phones are a bit thicker.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 years ago

      See, I want a smaller screen on my phone too, my big issue is that when manufacturers go with a small screen, they usually also think “budget phone”. No. Fuck you. I want a premium phone, same as any other flagship, but smaller. Sure, you can lose a camera, I don’t care as long as the pictures are still decent… You can put in a smaller battery too, there isn’t as much space inside so I get it… But give me all the same of all the other sensors and storage and everything.

      They just won’t.

    • Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 years ago

      There is a serious market for people like me

      Unfortunately this just seems to be not true. Samsung, sony, google, apple all had smaller phones in their lineup at one time but eventually pulled them from the stack because they were not profitable. Don’t even get me started on the small phone scene in the budget segment. Absolutely no options exist. The unfortunate reality is that while small phone enthusiasts like us are very vocal, we a vocal minority and not enough of us exist who can make designing a smaller phone viable for companies.

    • Mathazzar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 years ago

      Not necessarily true. Sometimes a corporation is willing to continue with a bad choice in order to achieve some strange goal. Just look at Facebook absolutely going all in on Meta or Disney going ham on strange starwars choices.

  • ByteWizard@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 years ago

    People don’t care. They buy whatever marketing tells them to buy. Lines around the block for the first iPhone when it was vastly inferior to the other phones of the day. Couldn’t even use custom ringtones. Knew then that people really are sheep.

        • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          Nope. I’d rather have a plastic or rubber shell and rubber mounting for the screen. They’ve made fragile as a marketing gimmick so you’d have to replace your phone sooner.

    • kamen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      That’s just an excuse. Yes, a waterproof phone is easier to manufacture if it has less holes, but in practice only around half of the phones are waterproof, and even those that are are rated at like 1 m / 30 minutes max.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 years ago

    Here’s my take on what phone companies will do next: replaceable batteries are back! With an inkjet twist:

    1- You have to buy them precharged

    2- You can no longer recharge them

    3- The phone will explode if it detects a 3rd party battery

  • almightyGreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 years ago

    I bought a Sony Xperia 1 V mostly because of this. No hole on the screen, it has a 3.5mm jack and tooless access to its SD/Sim card tray

    • ahornsirup@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 years ago

      Sony does a lot of things right, but I’m not spending €1200 on a phone that gets a measly 2 years of updates. With that hardware and that price tag there’s no excuse for that bullshit.