• PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m usually against tariffs but in this case it seems like a pretty fair tit for tat to China basically removing the budgetary concerns for their manufacturers that said manufacturer’s international counterparts won’t have.

    Subsidizing local production for local markets is fine enough, but exporting products made with an infinite money glitch active is more or less an intentional play at market capture.

    And before some sinoboo tries to gatcha me I do also object to examples where the west subsidizes domestic production for international markets.

    • Pulptastic@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I prefer the circular solution. Make a tariff equal to the delta, and use the tariff to subsidize local production and reduce the delta.

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      subsidizing production isnt a bad thing.

      it makes for a quicker transition to ev. its only a problem now because china is doing it.

    • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I want a $10000 car that would normally be inflated to $30000 in the US.

      I’m no lover of China, but fuck the capitalist auto companies.

      • Novi@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I was born into a car centric society. So much so they design the places we live around them. Including dense residential far away from employment that requires transportation. Chop all attempts at decent public transit and now you have created a market of completely artificial demand. Which the law says cars must become more expensive. I have to have a car because of the awful design choices made by unqualified politicians past. Fuck the auto industry. They could have been out saviors by being the example of what union companies do but instead chose violence.

      • Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        That $10k Chinese car cost $20k to make. A competitor undercutting the market that much leads to monopolization. When that competitor is being bankrolled by a foreign government it’s potentially even a hostile act.

        People have been mad for decades about what Walmart did to retail in the US. Taking steps to prevent that from also happening with the auto industry should be appreciated.

      • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Ah yes, great way to fuck over our capitalists, by supporting their worse capitalists instead

          • Buttons@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            US auto makers were like “we love the free market”, then people bought cheaper cars from China and they said “wait, not that free!”

            • Lavitz@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              No ethical way to spend in a capitalist society. It kind of is what it is, cause I gotta eat. Also certified “you criticize capitalism yet you live in it moment” to you sir.

              • nymwit@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                are all unethical choices equal? Surely there are better and worse things?

                  • nymwit@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Where I was going was: effects can be different even if all choices and results are unethical. If one cares about the possible impacts of ones actions, consideration beyond “well it’s all unethical, so whatever” could be warranted.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      How moral of you to object to the US government doing the same thing.

      Can I have a means of transportation I can fucking afford now?