Senator John Fetterman has signaled that he could reach a breaking point with the Democratic Party if Senator Chris Van Hollen is elected to Senate majority leader.

Fetterman, who has repeatedly clashed with members of his own party over Israel, suggested that Van Hollen’s potential leadership appointment would be troubling because of his criticism of the Israeli government.

Asked by Kayleigh McEnany during a Fox News interview on Saturday whether Van Hollen becoming majority leader would represent a red line that could prompt him to leave the Democratic Party, Fetterman responded: “Yeah, absolutely, it would be troubling if my caucus elects someone like Van Hollen, that has really made his name being very…hostile to Israel.”

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 hour ago

    The only meaningful adjustment that will result from him officially switching parties is that the party affiliation note in news articles and interviews will change from (D) to (R)

  • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Don’t let the door hit you on the way out!

    55-45 is still a good majority, and it’ll be way more productive than a 56-44 with Schumer as SML and Fetterman in the rank-and-file.

    Fetterman is threatening us with a good time.

      • vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 hour ago

        There are no political parties in the united states, on paper. Each representative is free to vote however they like, for whatever reason they like, once they are in office. Some states have a way to recall federal representatives, but not all do.

        Unlike parliamentary systems you are not (on paper) voting for a party, who appoints a representative; you are voting specifically for a singular person, who may associate with a party.

        Now because 250 years have happened between that idea and how congress actually works, the entirely made up and not constitutionally supported positions of ‘House majority leader’ and ‘Senate Majority leader,’ exist. These positions do not exist in the constitution, and did not exist for most of the country’s history. But these positions are now used to appoint committee assignments, and decide what legislation is voted on (primarily, there are ways to force votes, but that requires a supermajority of representatives agreeing to do that). Again these positions that effectively control how congress functions have no basis in the constitution, did not exist before 1925, and go directly against the purpose of congress and the concept of a political party-free government that the US was designed to be as to not descend into the corruption the founding fathers saw in the house of lords in the UK.

        But they’re super important now, because the corruption is too entrenched to get rid of.

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      As are many of the dems. Schumer, Jeffries, Haley Stevens, and Fetterman definitely are. And anyone in the “problem solvers” or “blue dog” and “congressional Israeli allies” caucuses might as well just be republicans. Traitors to the American people, all of them.

  • Vespair@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Hey bro I don’t know if you know this, but you’ve been broken from the Democrats. Not a single reasonable Democrat or Democrat voter in the country actually considers you a Democrat and they haven’t in a very very long time.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The Republicunt will stop pretending to be a democrat if the Democrats get competent leadership?

    Fuck, sounds like a deal to me.

  • boaratio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’m not trying to be mean, but I think him having survived a stroke was his Gary Busey moment.