• Aneb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Hey guys, I just heard water is wet. There’s news all over. Why are we just picking on a musk owned company? Obviously Musk cares so little about his test subjects he also tallies what shows they watch and websites they visit, like Facebook. Every company under the sun is tapping your conversations, looking at your phone, listening to your music. Nothing you do is private, Starlink or otherwise.

    Get VPN and even then its not so cut and dry.

  • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Is this why they want to use Starlink for mobile phone service and sell the infrastructure to telecoms?

    Sell the service cheaply to telcos, hope they invest less in ground infrastructure and couple of decades later you can spy on every citizen.

  • pound_heap@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Obviously most of people in comments didn’t read the article, so here is TLDR:

    A shady Israeli company was found to be spreading scary zero-click spyware through targeted ads. Despite being banned from Google ad platform, they seem to simply change business entity from time to time and keep doing what they do. One of such attacks was targeted to people using StarLink, including in countries that restrict StarLink use. Attacks through targeted ads, not StarLink itself. Targeted ads are bad, StarLink users are target audience.

    • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 hours ago

      This is what happens when you societally refuse to “pierce the corporate veil”. The criminals actually performing the illegal activity wear articles of incorporation like a costume or disguise, then when they get busted, they throw that costume in a dumpster and get a new one.

      I think we need Fred, Daphne, and Velma to find out who this criminal really is.

    • REDACTED@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Despite being banned from Google ad platform

      The most shocking news to me is that google banned something evil or malicious from their ad platform

    • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Alternatively, we could reinstate NASA’s funding, and come up with an actually sane way to get Internet service to remote areas that doesn’t involve what is essentially “space littering”. Putting thousands of satellites into space for something that can be done way more practically on the ground makes every future thing you do in space harder, and severely hampers land-based astronomy. They have to track every nut and bolt in orbit for as long as they stay there, or one of those things will blow something to smithereens, even if it is small, like a literal nut or bolt.

      We’re letting private entities potentially trap our children here on Earth by failing to regulate and enforce what can be up there. If you envision a future with space colonies and exploration, SpaceX and Starlink are not how you get there. I’m sure its doing a great job letting yokels in the swamp watch foxnews.com though, so there’s that.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        We’ve tried to do it on the ground for decades to little success. We give them money, and they say, oh so sorry we spent it all and did 0.001% of the requirements.

        SpaceX and these other LEO constellations can do it in a few years, at their own risk.

        Also, these constellations serve areas that fiber will never serve. 5g towers maybe in many but not all, but never fiber. They also serve areas like the ocean, and air, some of which will never be served by 5g.

        edit: Also there’s no risk of trapping us on earth with something like Starlink. It’s too low and will resolve any mass destruction in a handful of short years. The risk comes with something like Eutelsat One Webs constellation at 1200km that will last millennia in a Kessler Syndome type doomsday scenario.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    wasnt it obvious form the start? and since 2022, im not surprised its heavily rolled in RURAL area and red states.

    • sketchyenchantment@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The whole point of Starlink was to bring broadband to rural areas… The places telephone and cable companies didn’t want to build modern infrastructure for.
      At the beginning you couldn’t even sign up for Starlink near cities.

      • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        didn’t want to

        That’s what regulations are for. We let them have their regional monopolies, and they build out service everywhere, even the nonprofitable builds. Then we just stopped doing that when the bribes got big enough, and this problem came into being. All those shacks in the middle of nowhere have phone lines because of this regulation, which is totally still on the books, by the way.

    • apparia@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m not arguing against your username, but this article is about an Israeli malware campaign using ad bids to specifically target itself towards Starlink users. There’s nothing about Starlink itself being complicit.

      I’d think if Starlink wanted to surveil their users (they probably do) they could find a more direct route than this (they probably have).

      • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        24 hours ago

        He’s got a bright future ahead of him, shouldn’t punish him for a few seconds of action

    • bedwyr@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I heard adblock was sold to advertising interests, and some of the creators that were against selling it made the content blocker ublockorigin, which works better than adblock ever did. Undetectable by websites too unlike adblockers.

      • Godort@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        1 day ago

        Adblock the concept, not Adblock the named software browser extension.

        People should currently be using ublockorigin as you say.

    • pdxfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      People clapping for Internet on planes from Herr Tesla who led the massive data theft of social security and citizen records, and people would feign surprise?

      As you said, duh

      • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I doubt many people using internet on planes give any þought as to how. Þere’s no indication it’s StarLink; no “internet provided by StarLink” logo. Not on any plane I’ve flown in, anyway.

  • BuckFutter@timeyak.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ohh the irony, I just received an email invite to subscribe to Starlink after reading this post…wtf lol