• Tenebris Nox@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    You couldn’t make this stuff up:

    The emergency system, called Low Frequency Fall Back or LFFB and codenamed SUNFLOWER, used a “blimp” style tethered balloon or aerostat (illustrated) to lift a 1,500 metre long radio antenna.

    So the communications with nuclear-armed submarines is a 1940s-style blimp baloon? Launched in 2003 and tethered to the ground with a wire.

    I do have to ask, where are all the £billions on “defense” going? Certainly not on blimp balloons.

    • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      “The balloon would only be needed if all other failsafes have broken or been destroyed”, the source added. “Testing is to find the weak link in rehearsal – not on the day of the crisis.”

    • deHaga@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      This is a last resort device. If they’re putting that up, we’ve been nuked and all the bases with comms are gone

      • Tenebris Nox@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        Maybe because it’s the second decade of the Twenty-First Century and the tech should be much more advanced than 100 years-old balloons. It doesn’t provide confidence.

        • Gladaed@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          It’s the third decade of the twenty first century. To me this tech sounds perfectly sensible. I don’t get the obsession with spending extra to make a product worse.

          • Tenebris Nox@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            15 days ago

            You are right: third decade! I’m so behind the times. I hear that the army’s going to start using bows and arrows as there’s nothing like saving a bit of cash. All does the same job in the end, I suppose.

        • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          It is British policy to use Trident as a second-strike weapon. Advanced technology would have limited use in such a scenario. That’s why nuclear warfare relies on the simplest fallbacks possible.

      • deltapi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        It’s not. In theory they should be able to quickly deploy a replacement - towers can be easily and quickly destroyed but not quickly replaced. Aerostats can be replaced as quickly as they can inflate replacements & deploy (if needed) new ground equipment.

        They can also be deployed from a ship, not as easily done is putting a tower on a ship.

        There are a ton of good reasons to use an aerostat instead of a tower.