My preferred method is to weight votes according to age: voters below, say, 30 would receive a more heavily weighted vote, voters 30 to 60 would get a less weighted vote, and those over 60 would retain their current single vote. For argument’s sake, you could multiply the vote of under-30s by 1.3 and that of 30- to 60-year-olds by 1.1. People’s ballot papers could be distinguished by colour – under-30s get blue, 30s to 60s green and oldies red – to make counting easier on election night.

  • shads@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    Cool, remind me again what the plural of anecdote is… Is it data? It has to be data right?

    I gotta say you got my Boomer sense tingling.

    You seem angry, and confused. That’s a common state of mind as people get on in years. Relax, have a cuppa and if this is the way you feel on a regular basis consider talking to your GP, they can help out with resources and support to help you in this time of transition.

    • eremophila@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      I’m not angry or confused, I’m just taking the piss out of you because you are obnoxious. That seems to have made you “angry, and confused” you were of course already very generic.

      You are also daftly ironic re: anecdote