cm0002@infosec.pub to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 3 months agoGood luck homegirlinfosec.pubimagemessage-square50linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageGood luck homegirlinfosec.pubcm0002@infosec.pub to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 3 months agomessage-square50linkfedilink
minus-squareBarneyPiccolo@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 months agoDon’t count your chickens before they hatch. It’s hard enough to get two people to show up for sex, three is exponentially harder.
minus-squareboonhet@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 months agoIt’s exponentially easier if you’re an attractive woman
minus-squareddplf@szmer.infolinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 months agoNah, she kinda mid ngl spoiler … I am allowed to say that about a person whose career choice relies pretty much completely on aesthetical factors, right?
minus-squarePuddleOfKittens@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months ago“Attractive” is making an assumption here. Thankfully, it’s not a particularly important one.
minus-squareboonhet@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 months agoYou can google her, she’s not physically unattractive at the very least.
Don’t count your chickens before they hatch. It’s hard enough to get two people to show up for sex, three is exponentially harder.
It’s exponentially easier if you’re an attractive woman
Nah, she kinda mid ngl
spoiler
… I am allowed to say that about a person whose career choice relies pretty much completely on aesthetical factors, right?
“Attractive” is making an assumption here. Thankfully, it’s not a particularly important one.
You can google her, she’s not physically unattractive at the very least.