The court ruled that a lower standard applies to manual searches, allowing the government to conduct extraordinarily invasive electronic device searches without any suspicion of wrongdoing, simply because the border officer chooses to search by hand rather than with a forensic tool.

cross-posted from: https://piefed.social/c/[email protected]/p/2231481/the-fourth-circuit-says-border-agents-can-search-your-phone-by-hand-no-suspicion-requir

Legal intern Suzanne Castillo was the principal author of this post.The Fourth Circuit issued a disappointing opinion in U.S. v. Belmonte Cardozo, a case in which EFF filed an amicus brief, alongside the national ACLU, its Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia affiliates, and the…

  • DillDough@lemmy.zip
    2·
    10 days ago

    Practically the entire country is the border in US law and as you pointed out, law is dead here… obviously they aren’t going to state “we have the right to manually search every single person’s phone” because that would piss off everybody, we’ve been through shit this before and have definined borders to literally be like 95% of the country.