There’s a nonprofit that wants to do several meetings for lectures for about 3000 students. The presenter will show screen or share a document for the most part. At the end students would raise hand and have some discussion, so they will be just viewers for most of meeting
Of course, big corps like teams and google meeting won’t Handel this much, not for free at least.
Could I suggest jitsi to them? Can it Handel this much? How much is it going to cost?
You must log in or # to comment.
I’ve heard good thing about Jitsi, but I haven’t used it outside of matrix calls
lectures for about 3000 students
Could I suggest jitsi to them? Can it Handel this much?
I mean Jitsi is just software. It’s just a matter of how much the hardware can handle. Streaming a feed to 3k viewers will require some serious hardware.
I tried suggesting such a thing to the nonprofit I volunteer for and I was lambasted so good luck with that.
vital parts of jitsi are not multi-threaded, so a beefy machine with fast single-thread performance will be needed. but the network and bandwidth requirements will probably be an even bigger obstacle. going off their recommendations, it’d be at least 7.5gbps for 720p to 3000 participants.
As far as I know, Matrix is free, and you can use it through many apps who handle this communication protocol. The most well known is Element
If you try to use Matrix for a call with 3000 people you are seriously going to piss off the sysadmin of whatever instance you are on, and those 3000 people are going to end up being permanently banned.
Element mobile client (element x) doesn’t even have calls at all
Not correct.
I forgot to mention, I have Element Classic on my mobile, not sure about the X one
I’ve just checked, and I saw it has the little camera button for videocalls at the top right of the screen. Unless you’re talking about phone calls
Not for groups
Maybe Brave Talk? but it’s not free for big groups. Although it’s cheap: 7 USD/Month. And it doesn’t require an account.
Brave Talk is just skinned Jitsi. You can try Mullvad’s Jitsi, but good luck with 3k people.
In fact, for 3k people you just can use Youtube Live
Not much free will handle 3000 people in a video chat. It takes quite a bit of bandwidth and/or processing power to receive, merge, and broadcast 3000 video streams at once.
Do all 3000 really need to participate via video in a conference style system? If not then, why not use a live streaming platform instead of a conferencing system? Many have text chat capabilities, just not video except from the streamer.
