• Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I bet this headline hits VERY different to anyone who hasn’t paid attention for the last couple/few years to know about Reform the party.

    Without that context, he kinda sounds like a villain from a 1930s play 😄

    • milkisklim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      There was a cult in the American sitcom Parks and Rec called the reasonablists. They were named as such because if you disagreed with them, that would make you seem unreasonable. I feel Reform is a similar trap.

      • TheUnicornOfPerfidy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The name of Reform has always made me think of this too! You may as well call your party Nice Things. “Do you stand against Nice Things.” “See this is why we don’t have Nice Things.”

        • Monzcarro@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I heard someone pronounce it RE-form, the way you’d say reformed ham. This is now my preferred pronunciation for the reasons above.

          • fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            What does RE-FORM stand for anyway?

            Is it:
            Racists
            Economic Fraudsters
            Oligarchs
            Rapists
            Morons

            or

            Raping
            England
            For
            Oligarch’s
            Russian
            Money

            or

            Robbing
            England’s
            Future
            Over
            Rape
            Movies

            or

            Ruining
            Earth’s
            Future
            Over
            Risky
            Money

            or other?

  • Llamatron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    So much mega-important, world changing shit going on and we have this media stoked in-fighting nonsense going on.

    Fucking politics man.

      • Apepollo11@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Got to echo this.

        Unlike the low-stakes infighting nonsense that we often have, this is really important.

        Multiple polls have shown that not only is Andy Burnham much more popular than Starmer (big surprise, who isn’t?), but that he’s more popular than Farage. And that is a big deal, because almost nobody else is.

        He’s an attractive choice for the left, and he’s attractive for Northerners who want change - two camps which Starmer has well and truly lost.

          • Apepollo11@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I meant the general population, really.

            I live in a place where, realistically, the next MP is going to be Labour or Reform. I’m a member of the Green Party, but I’d vote Labour if Burnham was leading it. I wouldn’t at the moment.

            • zedcell@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Burnham will dance to the same Labour Together and Labour Friends of Israel tune, just like Starmer and Streeting. The person who stepped down for him was a parachuted Labour Together think tank leader, and Burnham has refused to call the genocide in Palestine a genocide. He has committed to the bizarre liberal “fiscal rules”, he has committed to Shabana Mahmood’s home office policies.

              He will be the same shit with a slightly different fragrance.

          • fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Not really… but I bet there’s quite a lot who’ll simply follow the current party line, so if the Labour leader were to steer things leftwards towards the centre (or ideally past it), many of them would follow it.

            • Tenebris Nox@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Starmer stood for Labour leadership on a considerably lefter platform than the vague stuff Burnham’s been saying. Burnham as PM isn’t going to change Labour’s current policies. He might be better at campaigning. When people realise that nothing’s going to change, helped by the rightwing press, they’ll turn on him too.

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is getting reported much more than the other by-elections that happened specifically because this one is quite likely to bring about a significant change in the UK’s national politics

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Gary called it and is hopeful that we might get wealth taxes (video). Let’s hope that Labour won’t be absolute tits on the issue.

  • insubstantialpageant@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Tactical voting, if continued by the left, is going to pull the Overton window strongly leftwards, and will ensure right wing parties have an extremely difficult time getting into power