“Experts in Europe warn that these devices are used to record strangers without their consent, possibly breaching EU law.”

“A small LED light is designed to indicate when recording is taking place, but RTBF’s investigators found that tutorials explaining how to conceal the indicator are abundant and easily accessible online.”

Sometimes I have a hard time deciding who I despise more, parasite Mark Zuckerberg or its witless hosts who keep using its products—yes, Zuck’s pronoun is it. Ban Ray-Ban, for frick’s sake.

  • Godric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Except the camera outside every shop and on every streetcorner, yeah!

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Those aren’t looking up her skirt, down her shirt, at your crotch or seeing your plumber’s crack, just for that purpose.

      • snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Most countries don’t have laws against recording public areas though, and generally as long as it’s not for commercial use even the ones that do haven’t set a precedent against it. The problem is when people are being recorded in compromising situations and in those cases it’s usually illegal.

    • codapine@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I see what you’re driving at, but CCTV cameras are recording 24/7 on the offchance that the footage is needed, just in case, by a body who is often regulated and monitored. Whereas the concern with the glasses is that they are operated by an otherwise anonymous individual and the recording is more likely to be targeted rather than a broadly cast net.

      The very reason the first camera phones had to be re-engineered to add mandatory shutter sounds to them.

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I think the mandatory shutter sound is a Japan-only thing.

      • Tiger666@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The very reason the first camera phones had to be re-engineered to add mandatory shutter sounds to them.

        What?!?

        Think about what you are saying for the love of all existence.

        Volume buttons have always existed on cell phones. Your statement makes no sense.

        Have a good day.

        • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Cell phones in Japan must have an audible shutter sound. Pretty sure turning down the volume isn’t enough to silence it.