He’s probably also an analog rapist.

This guy should be president.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._Jean_Carroll_v._Donald_J._Trump

In January 2020 Carroll’s attorneys served a request for a DNA sample from Trump for “analysis and comparison against unidentified male DNA present” on a black dress she was wearing when the alleged assault occurred. In December 2020 Carroll said she was willing to delay collecting the sample and testimony from Trump in exchange for earlier access to other relevant records. The DNA sample request included a DNA report on Carroll and five others who may have come into contact with the dress during a photo shoot.

. . . On February 10, 2023, Trump’s lead lawyer in the case since January 31, Joe Tacopina, said Trump would be willing to provide a DNA sample, although the discovery period had ended after three years of Carroll’s lawyers requesting such a sample.

. . . She said after entering the dressing room, Trump slammed her against the wall (hurting the back of her head) and digitally penetrated her before doing so with his penis (causing vaginal pain). She said she struggled against Trump, and upon leaving the store, was “extremely rattled” and in disbelief about what happened. She talked with her friend Lisa Birnbach on the phone, thinking, “If Lisa thought it was funny then it was not a bad thing and I didn’t completely do a stupid thing,” Carroll recalled thinking. “I had not processed it. I had not processed what was going on.” Birnbach told Carroll, who was laughing on the phone, that it wasn’t funny, that Carroll was raped and should report the assault to the police, Carroll testified.

. . . The jury reached a decision on May 9, 2023, after deliberating for less than three hours, the jury delivered a verdict that first stated that Carroll had not proven that Trump raped her, and next stated that Carroll did prove that Trump was responsible for a lesser degree of sexual abuse, and also stated that Trump defamed Carroll with false statements made with actual malice in the October 2022 Truth Social post; thus the jury awarded Carroll a total of $5 million in damages from Trump. The judge had given the jury “the narrow, technical meaning” of the term rape under New York law as it existed at that time, defining rape as forcible penetration with the penis as alleged by Carroll.

In an appearance on CNN the day after the verdict, Trump continued to disparage Carroll; he called her a “whack job”, said the trial was “rigged”, denied raping Carroll and said “I didn’t do anything else either,” and claimed “I don’t know who the hell she is.”

. . . In a memorandum opinion, Judge Kaplan wrote:

the definition of rape in the New York Penal Law is far narrower than the meaning of “rape” in common modern parlance, its definition in some dictionaries, in some federal and state criminal statutes, and elsewhere. The finding that Ms Carroll failed to prove that she was “raped” within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump “raped” her as many people commonly understand the word “rape”. Indeed, as the evidence at trial … makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.

And for bonus fun

Jessica Leeds, a retired stockbroker, testified that Trump had suddenly groped her in a similar manner to Carroll while Leeds was traveling on an airplane in the late 1970s. Leeds said a flight attendant invited her to move to first class and sat her next to Donald Trump, whom she did not know, and that he groped her breast and tried to kiss her, but that she broke away when he started reaching up her skirt. She recalled passengers sitting behind them, who did not intervene, and reasoned that the incident may have lasted less than a minute. Leeds said she did not speak about the incident but that Trump later saw her and referred to her as “that cunt from the airplane”.

Looks like we need to do this again.

Digital?

I quite like George