• pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I get why you’re asking for that, but I can’t give you one particular instance. I’ll try to explain it.

            If it’s in trump’s favor, they’ll say a confident fake or real. If it’s not in his favor, they’ll say that it’s mostly true or false. I have read them and checked them from reading about the topics for years, and then I’ll read their version. You can not trust me on this, but see for yourself.

            Edit: This is a really good example. Read the wording and the slant. What is the verdict?

            Terms like “found guilty” and “convicted” are reserved for criminal cases. This case, which centered on defamation, was a civil proceeding to decide the outcome of a lawsuit against Trump filed by Carroll. These cases do not determine guilt, but do determine “liability” for certain actions. Civil cases do not impose jail time or other criminal penalties, and as such require a different standard of proof:

            Because Trump was not convicted of a crime, it is not accurate to say that he is “a convicted sexual abuser.” Instead, it is accurate to say that a jury unanimously decided that it was more likely than not true that Trump sexually abused and forcibly touched Carroll, and as such, her defamation claim was valid.

            https://www.snopes.com/news/2023/05/09/trump-liable-sexual-abuse/

            • ORbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              In legalize, that’s perfectly normal and accurate language. It’s not reflective of emotional or realistic views, but it’s accurate.

              So, where’s the counterpoint to your statement? I would like to see an opposite version whereby Snopes is condemning leftists in the same way that they’re being lax toward Trump. for example, using the word “guilty” or “convicted” when it’s a civil trial.

  • Blibly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Next time a MAGA idiot says anything to you take a step back and then another step and keep going until you’re not anywhere near them anymore. No point in talking to them. They don’t even know what a communist is.

  • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    MAGA is the cliche communist stereotype they hate.

    DEAR LEADER CAN DO WRONG! CORRUPTION IS FAKE NEWS! HE SCAMS THE FAKE LOYALISTS OUT OF WEALTH, NEVER ME! HE IS DIVINELY TOUCHED AND WINS ALL OUR WARS!

  • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I don’t think he can raise his arm that high. His double dick jack off dance always keeps his arms low. Never parallel to the ground.