Justice secretary’s white paper will overhaul youth justice rules and could end lifelong criminal records for under-18s

  • teslekova@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    It’s not that it’s arbitrary, although it is. It’s more an admission that we could do far more, but choose not to spend the resources necessary, or the political capital to tackle the police and community culture (both interact to produce this situation even when the cops have the power).

    He probably chose it for motivational reasons. It’s a nice round number and it sells well in print or on TV, and you can shorthand it easily for stakeholders who will largely be either hostile to the basic idea or suspicious of your motives.

    • Zombie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      He’s a politician, he chose it for political reasons.

      When the police chase targets, numbers get fudged. KPIs, crime statistics, performance targets, stakeholder demands, call it what you want, they will aim for that number regardless of the consequences. It’s bad governance and results in things breaking.

      https://youtu.be/xH_6_8NOfwI

      • teslekova@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        Well, ok, what works better than targets? Gotta measure how you’re going somehow.

        Edit: btw, all those factors I mentioned are indeed political reasons.

        • Zombie@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 days ago

          Determining what your goal is in terms of outcome, not numbers or percentages.

          When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodhart's_law

          The more any quantitive social indicator is used for social decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt social processes it is intended to monitor.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campbell’s_law

          These things have been known about in sociology and political science for quite some time.