• Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s much easier to switch to clothes not made of plastic then it is to replace what we make tires out of.

    • Beacon@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Totally disagree. Mandating a drain filter would have almost zero opposition. Mandating that everyone in the public can no longer buy the huge variety of clothing styles that can only be achieved with synthetics would cause a giant uproar of opposition and would be almost impossible to get passed into law.

      You’re thinking about it from a technical standpoint, but you have to think in terms of how hard it would be to actually achieve.

      • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Sure, but a gradually increasing tax on the production any plastic containing fabrics would help naturally phase it out.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Plus mandate a filter on clothes washers. I’m sure there would be an entire subculture of reactionaries dedicated to removing them but most people wouldn’t

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Unfortunately not. Is there even another choice for tires that won’t shed microplastics? I’ve never read of one

          That being said, someone was proposing an affordable way to filter runoff from highways that we should at least try

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            No, the choice between safely biodegradable tires vs petro tires is a separate discussion from better pubic transit to reduce the need for those tires.

            A few things I’m going to point out though.

            1. It’s not the run off into streams and into drinking water that’s the likely point of intake. It’s the air we breath, epically in cities or along major highways where people are intaking the plastic.

            2. Don’t assume that just because something is natural means that it is completely harmless. Plenty of natural compounds are toxic.

            3. The family of compounds that we need to be concerned about the most is PFAS. It is a synthetic, but it’s because it’s a forever chemical and doesn’t metabolize out of the body.

            The first and easiest step would to remove the PFAS and create safe alternatives. It’s a weird Catch 22. It needs to be durable and long lasting so it doesn’t blow out on the highway, but it also needs to be weak and biodegradable so organic systems can break it down. EVs, even the EV busses, need even more durable tires as the torque is higher.

            Even if you got wide spread train adoption, people still need to get to those trains and bikes still have rubber tires. Busses use less rubber compared to cars per person, but it’s still not zero.

            Connecting mircoplastic from runoff seems like a wasted effort. What do you do with it afterwards? Burn it? Try and recycle it? Plastic is hard to recycle. Better to keep the most harmful plastics from being created in the first place.