Surveillance protects people from terrorism, and sacrificing some privacy makes us safer.
Do you agree? If not, what is your counterargument?
Surveillance protects people from terrorism, and sacrificing some privacy makes us safer.
Do you agree? If not, what is your counterargument?
Surveillance gives terrorists like the US and its Zionist appendage a huge advantage, and the working class should not be surrendering its data to them without a fight.
That’s a strong counterpoint, do you have another one for other countries like China, India, Japan, South Korea… that is not deeply involved with Zionist?
Japan and South korea are just US vassals and heavily rely on their intelligence network so they are indirectly involved. India I’m less familiar with their surveillance apparatus but I know the country is full of corruption so I doubt it’s for the benefit of the people. from my understanding, china is under much less “oppressive surveillance” than western propaganda would lead you to believe, but on principle I’m still opposed to what they have set up as well.