• Cyrus Draegur@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m not even on your coast – LITERALLY the other side of the continent in New England – and i am rooting for you SO FUCKING HARD

          GLORY TO CASCADIA!

          I wish New England would secede get bought by Denmark too…

          • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I kind of wonder if Cascadia could be peacefully done. I mean, most Republicans despise California, and have no love for Oregon or Washington. I wonder if there would be a peaceful way for them to be like “hey, we’re just going to separate off. We’ll set up really good trade relations at the start, and have fairly open immigration policy between our countries (to let the more left leaning in, and the more… diplomatically, let’s say right-leaning out) for a few years.” Then each fucks off their own way, Colorado laments it’s position in a sea of deep red (sorry y’all), and Cascadia can write a new constitution that doesn’t suck donkey balls and allow for the worst loopholes and lack of enforcement.

            Edit: and the official song could be Cascada’s “Evacuate the Dance Floor Red States.”

          • btsax@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I always wanted New England to join Canada and be part of the Maritimes so that the time zone would make more sense. And so New Englanders could get healthcare that wasn’t tied to employment

        • tomiant@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Meanwhile Taiwan and the South China Sea goes bye bye, and Russia takes the Baltics.

          A new world order. Woo.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            A new world order. Woo

            This, but not sarcastically.

            The current world order sucks big floppy donkey dick.

            Not saying that I would want the specific one YOU’RE imagining, but this one has been rotten since its inception. As was the previous one ever since Thatcher, Reagan, and Bananarama established it.

      • tomiant@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        The problem is, so would the fascists, because they think they would win the ensuing civil war, which is a pretty solid bet as long as they are in charge of the military, which they are, and they will stay in charge until they force the civil war that they believe they will win. We are watching it happen in real time. They aren’t even waiting for those “catalyzing events” that they are priming for, because they’re behind schedule, so they are going to just go ahead anyway. Look, nobody is doing shit about it anyway, and if they did- well yhere you go, martial law and suspended elections straight away.

        The military will do as they are told by the chain of command. Who’s in command is dictated by a deeply flawed system that only ever pretended to be democratic. These were always the inevitable distal results. Call me doomey. Watch the world and see the facts and call me doomey.

        We are not dealing with geniuses here. It’s pretty obvious what they planned. It’s like watching the evil guys in a dumb marvel movie. It’s really not that complicated.

        Prophecy over.

        • nickiwest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Who’s in command is dictated by a deeply flawed system that only ever pretended to be democratic.

          You’re right. The founding fathers did not intend to create a democracy. They created a republic with elected leaders who were chosen exclusively by wealthy, educated white men.

          We certainly can’t fault them for not foreseeing how much American society – and the electorate – would change and how little the Constitution would change.

          I truly believe that if they had any inkling how little we would change the Constitution in 250 years, they would have written a whole article requiring a Constitutional Convention every 25 or 50 years.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          they think they would win the ensuing civil war, which is a pretty solid bet as long as they are in charge of the military,

          Not so fast. We’re in charge of the military’s technology, not r enough of it to make a difference. Let them come but they may be surprised at what they end up targeting

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The problem California would have as its own country would be defending the massive border it has with the failed state next door.

      • Big_Boss_77@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m sure someone will come in and tell me why this is a dumb idea, which is why I’m asking…

        But why wouldn’t nuclear power plants and desalination plants render water issues a thing of the past?

        Is it no other reason than the hurdles of nuclear boogeymen?

  • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Canada should do this to ancquire Alaska too.

    there’s no good reason it’s not part of Canada. It’s not even the US’s land.

    • tomiant@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      It lies directly next to Canada, it’s not even connected to the USA. Psychologically, Canada needs it.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Canada can invade New England to balance out those Trumpies. I already have my maple syrup ration plus smuggled in some Tim’s

  • humanamerican@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Would make more sense if they offered to buy Utah or Alabama or some other state that wouldn’t want to be bought by a country with a sane government.

  • frazw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I mean by what right does California belong to the USA. I mean all they did was roll a wagon onto the land 500 years ago. Who’s to say the Danish didn’t around the same time too?

    (sorry indigenous Californians your righteous and original claim doesn’t help me make my point)

      • Horsey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        IIRC the Spanish took over the land as a place to put the Muslims after the Iberian “crusades”.

      • frazw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Ok, I’m not trying to be factually accurate. I’m trying to point out the idiocy of trump’s comments

    • Horsey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      California has only been a thing since the mid 19th century, so half that time lol

      • frazw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Ah I see, you were thinking the sarcastic response to trumps factually inaccurate statement should be factually accurate. Got it.

          • frazw@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I meant that I was being sarcastic in my first post, not you. I was copying what Trump said about Greenland and Denmark landing a boat there and applying it to california to try to show how ridiculous his position is. I was not trying to be factually accurate. I was trying to poke fun at him. It seems it was either not as obvious as I thought or just a bad joke.

  • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I honestly believe there are more people who would like the USA to become a part of Denmark than there are people who want Greenland

    • frank@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      But the GDP per Capita is not insanely different, $85k vs 102k (source: wiki)

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Did you mean “New Denmark would have a GDP more than ten times old denmark”?