• Microw@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        And tbf the Minardi team would have most likely disappeared completely if Red Bull had not bought it back then

    • Thorry@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Ferrari and Haas have a very similar deal, they just aren’t as obvious about it.

      • edcasting@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I wonder if people are gonna keep making this comparison when Haas is rolling with a Toyota logo all over… why can’t people just admit that Red Bull is the only competitor allowed to control 2 teams?

    • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      The best answer is basically “it was a different time back then”. You can look into the history of Minardi and the Red Bull purchase if you like, but it wasn’t seen as a problem at the time. They wouldn’t be allowed to were it to happen now I’m pretty sure, but they’ve kind of been grandfathered in at this point.

      • Supercrumpet@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Exactly, and similar to the Ferrari bonus pay, it’s just become difficult to address at this point, so everyone kind of accepts it.

        • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Very similar situation yeah. The Red Bull purchase of Minardi was at a time when finances were vastly different, Formula 1 was a one-way ticket to losses and everyone were mostly just happy to have the team stay on the grid and not dissolve.