The only, only reason that the civil rights movement worked was because they had black panthers backing them up. Without threat of violence peaceful protests dont work.
Kinda crazy that in a space where we are concerned about a armed and masked gunman murders a woman in cold blood, as we wonder how to best cope and move forward - people will still argue about search engine choices.
They might be, depending on their region.
I only know what a q-tip is because I’ve seen americans say it online.
And while Kleenex is a brand over here, you’d get a slightly funny look if you asked for ‘a kleenex’ rather than ‘a tissue’.
Velcro is definitely used here though, and so is googling, but variants of ‘look it up’ are more commonly used because it’s more generic.
For those of us that are lazy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_flank_effect
“The radical flank effect refers to the positive or negative effects that radical activists for a cause have on more moderate activists for the same cause.”
"Greater differentiation between moderates and radicals in the presence of a weak government.[2][13][14]: 411 As Charles Dobson puts it: “To secure their place, the new moderates have to denounce the actions of their extremist counterparts as irresponsible, immoral, and counterproductive. The most astute will quietly encourage ‘responsible extremism’ at the same time.” "
This is bullshit. The Civil Rights Movement worked because people couldn’t argue in favor of the relentless violence inflicted on non-violent protesters.
This entirely modern bullshit is propaganda designed to incite violence today.
For the past two hours, you’ve been arguing against gun rights. Which is okay - you do you. Not everyone should own a gun. We all see the stats.
But you do realize the white woman who got executed didn’t incite violence?
And you do realize that at the height of police brutality during BLM violence - armed BLM protesters stood peacefully to protect the disenfranchised, protesters like yourself - the normally aggressive police behaved?
We get it. YOU don’t like guns. But when they’re shooting unarmed white women who don’t incite violence, a lot of people would prefer to keep their guns with them right now.
The only, only reason that the civil rights movement worked was because they had black panthers backing them up. Without threat of violence peaceful protests dont work.
Google “radical flank effect”
Holy hell
Or just use any other better search like Bing or duckduckgo. googol sucks and was never any good; quit pushing garbage.
Kinda crazy that in a space where we are concerned about a armed and masked gunman murders a woman in cold blood, as we wonder how to best cope and move forward - people will still argue about search engine choices.
Going to take me a lonnnng time to retrain my brain to not use “google” as a verb. I need to swap to the generic “search” or something
Or we make Google the generic term for searching something online and they lose the trademark.
I use google as a generic verb to search for something on the internet
This is a lie. Google used to be borderline psychic.
Right? Google has been shit for at least 5 years, but let’s not pretend it wasn’t the best search engine by far for years.
fr. in the early days of the web, like pre 2005, it was a revelation
I hope you’re this pedantic when people ask for a Kleenex or a q-tip, or when they use Velcro
They might be, depending on their region.
I only know what a q-tip is because I’ve seen americans say it online.
And while Kleenex is a brand over here, you’d get a slightly funny look if you asked for ‘a kleenex’ rather than ‘a tissue’.
Velcro is definitely used here though, and so is googling, but variants of ‘look it up’ are more commonly used because it’s more generic.
It’s not “Velcro” you’re using. That’s a company. You can’t use a company to hold stuff in place. You can use Velcro-brand hook- and loop-fastener.
Don’t Call it Velcro
What else can you call a qtip?
Cotton bud, cotton swab, ear bud
For those of us that are lazy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_flank_effect “The radical flank effect refers to the positive or negative effects that radical activists for a cause have on more moderate activists for the same cause.” "Greater differentiation between moderates and radicals in the presence of a weak government.[2][13][14]: 411 As Charles Dobson puts it: “To secure their place, the new moderates have to denounce the actions of their extremist counterparts as irresponsible, immoral, and counterproductive. The most astute will quietly encourage ‘responsible extremism’ at the same time.” "
Hey, that’s me!
This is bullshit. The Civil Rights Movement worked because people couldn’t argue in favor of the relentless violence inflicted on non-violent protesters.
This entirely modern bullshit is propaganda designed to incite violence today.
For the past two hours, you’ve been arguing against gun rights. Which is okay - you do you. Not everyone should own a gun. We all see the stats.
But you do realize the white woman who got executed didn’t incite violence?
And you do realize that at the height of police brutality during BLM violence - armed BLM protesters stood peacefully to protect the disenfranchised, protesters like yourself - the normally aggressive police behaved?
We get it. YOU don’t like guns. But when they’re shooting unarmed white women who don’t incite violence, a lot of people would prefer to keep their guns with them right now.
Removed by mod