This was bound to happen, and it’s ridiculous

    • nimpnin@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s so weird. Just don’t give your kids unrestricted internet access if you’re concerned about any of this…

        • latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zonedeleted by creator
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Or, y’know… they could do some actual parenting and talk to their kids about this. Kids aren’t morons, they’re just inexperienced. They are actually capable of understanding, like, words and stuff as long as one offers enough context for them… Actually teach the kids to use the internet, help them develop some insights.

          And if anyone’s panicked about the immoral stuff going on in the porn industry (and there are plenty of things to be addressed and critiqued about a hystorically predatory domain), then address those directly! Friggin’ nurture their critical thinking and empathy! Locking them up in the fucking basement isn’t gonna Protect Them From Evil™, it just ensures they’ll be maladapted and sociopathic once they manage to escape from the fucking prison!

          • paultimate14@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            And if anyone’s panicked about the immoral stuff going on in the porn industry (and there are plenty of things to be addressed and critiqued about a hystorically predatory domain)

            You’re 100% correct, but I would also like to point out how weird it is that porn seems to be the ONLY industry where these religious nutjobs pretend to care about workers.

            In the US, the same people who say they care about the porn industry preying upon women are the same ones rolling back child labor legislations to send 14 year olds to meat packing plants. The same ones who have kept the minimum wage where it is for decades. The same ones who want to ban abortion even in cases where the woman’s life is threatened. I know this is a BBC article about the UK, but I can’t help but see some parallels with the right-wing religious conservatives everywhere in the world.

            They don’t care about women. They don’t care about children. They don’t care about workers. They care about having lots of cheap labor. They care about parents being too tired, too overworked, too risk-averse for the sake of their children to dare to fight back. They want a world where peasant girls get married at 14 and start cranking out more babies immediately. Any substitute which threatens that (birth control, abortion, homosexuality, pornography, sex education) is under attack.

            • ubergeek@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              seems to be the ONLY industry where these religious nutjobs pretend to care about workers.

              Nah, they dug in with it in the healthcare field, when “fighting for nurses” who were idiots and thought vaccines killed people.

            • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              They want a world where peasant girls get married at 14 and start cranking out more babies immediately.

              It’s what Jesus would have wanted

            • latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zonedeleted by creator
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              Yep, it’s always about profit and control with these assholes, never about what’s right or wrong. And even the religious pretext is just utter bullshit from where they’re standing, using it to make the pill easier to swallow for the brainwashed masses, nothing more…

              These people don’t give a fuck about any sort of god or code, they just want more money and more power. That’s all there is to it.

            • _number8_@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              In the US children get shot and killed at school on a monthly basis and all the government can think to do is age-gate porn and ban books

            • irmadlad@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              In the US, the same people who say they care about the porn industry preying upon women are the same ones rolling back child labor legislations to send 14 year olds to meat packing plants. The same ones who have kept the minimum wage where it is for decades. The same ones who want to ban abortion even in cases where the woman’s life is threatened. I

              …and guess what. Those same people are the ones didling the children. I can fill your inbox weekly with examples of clergy, police, republicans, christo facist et al. Now, don’t even think for a second that I give the democrats a pass either. However, the list of democrats is much shorter, but fuck them both. Me thinks they doth protest too loudly.

              I’m neiher republican nor democrat. Just a lowely American. I don’t need a political echo chamber to have a political compass.

              • paultimate14@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 months ago

                At the very least, most of the Democrats are guilty of taking money from those ghouls.

                To bring it back to Palantir, Biden himself was singing their praises back when he was vice president and the US government was using their surveillance tools.

                As much as it is good to see MAGA turn on Trunk over the Epstein files, it’s not lost on me that Garland, under Biden, sat on the files doing nothing for 4 years. And maybe that would make sense if they were actively investigating and trying to prosecute people, but as far as I can tell Maxwell is the only one who faced any consequences.

                I don’t want to distract the narrative away from Trump’s guilt. And also, when you stack up presidential accomplishments I’d still rank Biden near the top, probably top-5 in US history. But that says more about the other presidents than Biden.

                • irmadlad@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Our government in the US is corrupt and compromised top to bottom and side to side, and has been for quite a long time now. No one gets a pass.

      • StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        What’s wild is that I have to assume most of us don’t. My friends have said outright their kids won’t get smart phones until a certain age and are consciously deciding media access levels for different ages.

        We all grew up with open internet and most of us know that it was a bad thing. We don’t need laws to govern access.

        It’s just an excuse to build more surveillance and censorship systems. Mostly, because we all learned various empowering things from the internet growing up that was outside of their state funded systems.

        This is not an endorsement of homeschooling. Merely a statement that, even with the bad of the internet, we also learn many things that annoyed politicians and elites alike.

        The 2010s were full of protests and organizing made possible by open access to information. That’s the real problem.

      • latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zonedeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Good point, I do feel my brain liquefying and gushing out through my friggin’ ears when seeing what we’re doing to ourselves…

  • FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    [Find in Page:] “Parent”=0 “Parents”=0 “Father”=0 “Mother”=0

    It’s their job to guard their kids from this content first and foremost. It’s their job to put it into context for their children. But the article doesn’t even mention that any of this is a humongous failing of parents.

    Next this commissioner will want to outlaw computer mice because they’re used to click pornographic content without verifying the age of the finger on the button. And roads because adult content actors use them to get to jobs.

    The way forward is not banning or making worse all sorts of useful tools as collateral damage in this “think of the children” campaign. It is to get all adult content everywhere behind a barrier toddlers cannot break. We were fine with porn mags partially obscured on the top shelf at a news agent when that was a thing. And the salesperson making sure the customer wasn’t a minor. The solution isn’t closing all digital news agents.

    And it’s quite telling that the existence of VPNs didn’t play a bigger part in this UK online safety initiative. Like it wasn’t obvious that when the west entrance to porn central was closed off, people wouldn’t naturally look for the ones in east, north, and south.

    Edited typo

  • ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    It feels like a return of the pornography/video games/rock music moral panic of the late 20th century. I wish these conservative idiots would just fuck off. We’ll do anything before we tackle things that are really affecting children. Like poverty and hunger, in one of the world’s richest countries. We’re a joke of a country, no wonder people keep making fun of us. We deserve it.

      • MoonMelon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        It seems like a perpetual panic, sustained because it creates a lever of exploitation to control the gullible. Like you can read complaints about “oversexed youth” from time periods when pornography was totally banned and women were essentially chattel. And hey, Boomers didn’t have internet porn and they are fucked.

    • Zerush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Are not the US citizen a joke, you can not blame people who were educated in ignorance by the Governments, more in the fear of God than in the lack of reasoning capacity in a pseudo-democracy. Living in abubble and helpless in shock, when they visit Europe, seeing what means living safe and protected, with rights they even didn’t know that they exist. This is only sad, we make fun of your crappy fascist system and the current pedo-nazi asshole of president, not the people which don’t know it better.

  • Hauntology95@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    A friend recently told me that palantir has some sort of stake in this data management for the OSA? Is this true? I know they’ve had a deal with NHS England for a few years

    If so, our world is taking a very scary turn

    If anyone hasn’t I’d advise to do research on palantir, Peter thiel and Curtis Yarvin for a window into the psychology of the people pushing us down this road

    Here’s a great video on the subject

    • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      If Thiel’s mafia organisation (I refuse to call that scrap by sir Tolkien’s works’ names) has a deal with the NHS, then that should be ended ASAP. Fuck that, that’s some serious spying.

      Capitalism is shit, but there are things where it especially NEVER, EVER should have any access, power or influence, directly or indirectly:

      • Health services
      • Parliaments, committees, assemblies
      • Nature
      • Housing
      • Water and food
      • National security
  • icelimit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I have a great job lined up in the UK, I’m not sure I can take it up considering that is turning into this kind of shit hole.

    • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I wouldn’t take it up, honestly. Best to go for somewhere in the EU instead.

      The UK is a US puppet state, and pretty much showing it.

      • icelimit@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m EU adjacent, with better privacy laws and definitely aware of the role parents need to play in parenting and of government overreach. I’m happy here but dem monies

        • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Hmm, I don’t know your situation, but if you’re living in Switzerland, Norway, the Faroe Islands, or Iceland, I honestly would just recommend staying there.

          If it’s in Serbia, Montenegro, Kosovo, or Bosnia, then yeah, fair. But I thought none of those had good privacy laws?

          Can’t imagine Belarus, Ukraine, Russia, or Turkey have good privacy laws. And certainly not any of the North African countries…

        • WittyProfileName2 [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah, and they’ve jumped the “protect our kids” wankery into overdrive as well.

          Complete doomer mode: I think they’re also gonna re-establish section 28 soon.

            • WittyProfileName2 [she/her]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              Section 28 of the 1988 local government act (often just referred to colloquially as section 28), was a law that made it illegal to discuss queer identities in schools.

              here's the relevant excerpt of the act

              2A

              Prohibition on promoting homosexuality by teaching or by publishing material

              (1)A local authority shall not—

              (a)intentionally promote homosexuality or publish material with the intention of promoting homosexuality;

              (b)promote the teaching in any maintained school of the acceptability of homosexuality as a pretended family relationship.

              (2)Nothing in subsection (1) above shall be taken to prohibit the doing of anything for the purpose of treating or preventing the spread of disease.

              (3)In any proceedings in connection with the application of this section a court shall draw such inferences as to the intention of the local authority as may reasonably be drawn from the evidence before it.

              (4)In subsection (1)(b) above “maintained school” means,—

              (a)in England and Wales, a county school, voluntary school, nursery school or special school, within the meaning of the Education Act 1944; and

              (b)in Scotland, a public school, nursery school or special school, within the meaning of the Education (Scotland) Act 1980.”

              It was repealed in 2003, but the recent resurgence of homophobia in parliament is using a similar language around “protecting children” is identical to the shit Thatcher and her cronies were throwing around in the 80’s.

              for example (CW: homophobia)

              • Infernal_pizza@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 months ago

                Oh wow, I hope you’re wrong but who knows at this point considering one of the only noteworthy things they’ve done in the last year is attack trans people. What’s the source of that last image? I’m really hoping that’s one of the examples from the 80s and not a recent one…

  • yoriaiko@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Make controlled corn illegal.

    Make VPN illegal.

    Make horny illegal.

    Make showing body and hairs in public illegal.

    This little drama may be UK specified, but govs are pushing borders of how much they can squeeze us before society starts to boil. We should boil and explode fast and faster each time, making such gov illegal instead.

    Just saying… And I did not speak out, Because I was not an UK citizen.

      • yoriaiko@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m bit worried, do You mean what will spread, gov and company greed, or citizen disobedience?

        I won’t delude anyone for hunger for power and money will only grow while eating. But citizens fighting for their freedom, uhm… well… sure, there is always breakpoint, when society will explode and do fight… but so far, it looks like, greed do 10 steps front, society explode, and greed do 1 step back, all calm, and greed do next 10 steps forward, another protest, another 1 step back, another chill, and next 10 steps…

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I have yet to read any coherent argument why any kind of media that young people actively choose to watch, actively seek out, would ever be harmful to them.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Fox News?

      Or really any media that gives a warped view of reality. Movies glorifying drug use, eating disorders, stuff like that. I’m sure you’ve heard about people getting hurt from tiktok “challenges”. Kids are fucking stupid.

    • blackbearjesus27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s the battle-cry of insecure folk growing old.

      If I don’t like it, it must be bad. But if I don’t understand it, it must be dangerous.

      • pugnaciousfarter@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        There’s something off it’s not just some conservative folks.

        It’s happening everywhere suddenly out of nowhere.

        Steam, itch, youtube, UK, australia.

        Something definitely off.

        • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          All the details point to Palantir from what I’ve read. There is this sudden massive surveillance and censorship push everywhere we look. I’m convinced they are trying to funnel people into a position where they have zero privacy (and eventually payment system) protections. We’re going to see new tech pop up. A Palantir VPN; a Palantir payment processor; some new crypto banking system. They’re forcing us all into a world where Elon Musk’s stupid “Everything Platform” idea is a reality so that we are beholden to a single entity that possesses all of the keys.

          • paultimate14@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            I think Rupert Murdoch is involved too. And I think it’s good to mention Peter Thiel, the owner and founder of Palantir, any time they are brought up.

            There have been a ton of governments swinging rightwards suddenly too. Not just the US- the UK has a long stretch of Conservative governance that was only barely broken by Labour in 2024, and the Labour party has drifted so far right that the Reform party was created. Germany is dealing with their own alt-right menace. Conservative middle-eastern governments like Saudi Arabia and the UAE have been spreading their global influence. The Philippines had their stint with Duterte. India has had a right-wing Prime Minister, Modi, since 2014. And of course, we have Netanyahu of Israel and Putin of Russia.

            Personally, I look to the downfalls of communist states. The USSR collapsing in 1991, leading to the absolute mess of oligarchs looting the publicly owned assets and turning them into private fortunes. The opening of China to the west started by Deng Xiaoping led to similar issues there. The rise of the oil age, which helped both those Russian oligarchs and middle eastern petrostates (and the US. And the Scandinavian petrol states, though they at least moved to social democracy instead of authoritarianism).

            All of a sudden all of this power was concentrated in the hands of just a few hundred businesspeople and politicians. Reagan and Thatcher happened. Socialist governments everywhere were undermined by the US government. Then economic crash after economic crash after economic crash. The dot-com bubble, 9/11, the 2008 financial crisis, wars everywhere, Brexit, the invasion of Ukraine, the pandemic. Every earthquake that hit Japan, every hurricane that was horribly mismanaged by FEMA, the fires in Hawaii and California and Australia and Canada.

            Every disaster a new opportunity for those few hundred people in power to tighten the screws, acquire more power, and distance themselves from the rest.

            I don’t mean this as a conspiracy. The billionaires fight each other too sometimes. Trump mostly seems like Putin’s puppet, but there are some exceptions. Putin backs Iran while Trump backs Israel. Putin was on good terms with Musk, and afaik that has not changed while Trump has distanced himself from Musk publicly. Just that the overall trend has been towards power moving from the people into the autocrats globally for the past few decades.

      • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I would have thought that by now, enough voting adults would have grown up also having watched online pornography when they were underage and realizing it didn’t harm them.

  • Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Josh Lane was addicted to porn by 14-years-old after first finding it via a Google search when he was aged 12.

    Now 25 and happily married.

    Wow. Porn really destroyed this mans life. What a tragic tale.

    • MoonMelon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      If jacking off constantly at age 14 doomed a person we would never have left the Miocene epoch.

      • irmadlad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Tho not so prevelant in this current timeline with internet access, there is a global phenomenon that most little boys can attest to. When we were growing up, there was forest porn. No one knew how it got there. No one claimed it. But in every town, county, village, city, et al, there were some woods with forest porn.

        I do not condone children viewing porn because they are not mentally or emotionally ready for that. However, I do know it exists and gosh, it seems to me that some proper parenting skills would solve a lot of problems.

        • untorquer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Forest porn was absolute roided out boomer oriented garbage. Worst slop you’ve seen a billion times.

          On the other hand, the early videos with the old Lady teaching 13yr old me how to eat someone out and anatomy were better sex ed than school and “the talk”(didn’t happen lol) combined.

    • LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s not like it can’t happen, i also found porn very early on. I got addicted and it ruined my early sex life. Real women weren’t “exciting” anymore and I’d lost my sensitivity as well.

      This is NOT the solution but it’s also not not an issue

      • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Thank you for speaking up. I’m going to share a bit of my experience (unrelated to you, OP.)

        I suspect (from my experience dating men) that the desensitivity issue is more common than most people will admit. Few men want to admit that their dick doesn’t work properly, and a subset of those men will attempt to frame this problem as a benefit instead (“I can keep going for so long without cumming, it’s my super power!”) I don’t expect most men will talk with each other like this, but it’s one of the justifications such men tell their partners.

        From the partner’s perspective, I hate to have to say this, but… no, it’s not a power. It’s a weakness. A desensitized dick turns sex into a frustrating act that only ends when I get physically sore. If he doesn’t have that “natural stopping point” that usually signals an end to penetration, and the act still feels good to him - he doesn’t want to stop, so why would he? But it’s a very different experience from the “receiving” partner’s perspective. Most people who “receive” in sex don’t want to keep going until they end up in pain. We don’t want to always be the buzz-kill whose role is to decide, “Okay, sex time is over!” I want to have fun, too; not be the playground monitor that has to announce when recess is finished. Going on and on is a porn fantasy, and just like many porn fantasies, it’s not that fun in real life.

        The issue of porn-induced desensitivity is absolutely real. However, taking away people’s privacy online is not the solution. These laws are absolutely absurd and a terrifying glimpse of the future the fascists in power are aiming toward. (And for anyone overly-concerned about my sex life that feels the need to chime in with advice - I learned from the lessons of my past, and I share those lessons in hopes that others can learn from it too.)

    • Synapse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      He told Newsnight the addiction caused him to isolate himself from friends and family because he was “afraid of anyone discovering that I was hooked.”

      Mr Lane described finding “the only place I could get, I guess, love and intimacy was from pornography” at the same time as feeling “heaps of guilt and shame”

      The problem seems to have more to do with lack of proper sex education and social pressure rather than pornography. Why did he have to feel so ashamed that he isolated himself? That’s a real issue here!

    • AreaSIX @lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Addiction to porn is not a real thing. No reputable source classifies compulsive viewing of porn as an addiction as far as I know. These people just find it to be a convenient excuse for their compulsions.

    • Zerush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Naturally is a problem of the parents and of nobody else, but the childrens are only an excuse of legislators to impose control, the only reason. If not the children than are crimes or terrorism to justify surveillance. More fascist an gov, more censorship, more biased information and less privacy is supported, it’s an axiom, the best citizen is an ignorant and submissive one. “First they banned childs from porn sites, than they banned anonym access to Wikipedia and VPN…” recipe how to cook a frog

      https://docs.house.gov/meetings/GO/GO02/20220407/114616/HHRG-117-GO02-20220407-SD018.pdf

      Repeating history by the same assholes to kill the free and open internet and information.