• Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Another issue is batteries don’t change (significantly) in mass during flight. Most airliners have greater takeoff weight than landing weight, because after flying a jet for a few hours you’re going to burn many tons of fuel. Batteries don’t do that, so you’d have to have an airplane capable of landing at it’s MTOW.

    • quantumcrop@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Also planes tend to increase their cruising altitude as weight decreases, it’s more efficient due to the lower air resistance. Electric motors would be more efficient across a wider range of conditions than turbo fans though.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s all moot though, because you must don’t have the energy density for long haul flights in batteries. They’re trying to make air taxis happen again. They were talking up air taxis before 9/11, and they never really happened. And back then they were talking about using existing aircraft driven by conventional gasoline or jet fuel. Now we’re talking about new airframes with battery electric power.