You’re literally in a thread about a guy cheering for the death of others and you’ve decided to troll the guy saying that killing is morally wrong. How can you say this shit with a straight face?
Saying that killing is morally wrong, or saying that an individual is hateful, is a nothing sentence. It’s not an opening of discourse or planet brained insight. When asked a follow up, to elucidate, you assume the position of actors and extol your own virtue by putting down the rest.
It’s nout but antagonism for the purpose of whysoever a troll would do anything. Getting jollies off by calling high horse, or moral corruption.
You make playing in the shit look like fun, and then feign upset when others join you.
Lol, moral judgement from the guy cheering for the murder of innocents. Please just go spend some time on yourself before you talk shit about others. Just because you’re corrupt doesn’t mean that everyone to speak to must also be as corrupt as you.
Come now. When people say strawmanning, they tend to mean that someone has taken the time to at least turn a pile of straw into the shape of a man but you can’t even be arsed to do that.
Just standing next to it and calling it a man is even sadder.
You started too many chats and feel like you need to argue them all but you can’t even remember who said what.
“Anyone not fighting my corner is for the murder of innocents”
Sounds a bit brain-rotty, fella. A tad corrupt.
Nice attempt at trolling. Try not cheering for people to be killed before you get up on your high horse.
Ahhhh, I get it. No instances of me cheering at the death of others, so the other party has to fake the argument. Petty, and a pity.
Come now, you’ve started discourse with others, you really ought to answer their questions.
You’re literally in a thread about a guy cheering for the death of others and you’ve decided to troll the guy saying that killing is morally wrong. How can you say this shit with a straight face?
Saying that killing is morally wrong, or saying that an individual is hateful, is a nothing sentence. It’s not an opening of discourse or planet brained insight. When asked a follow up, to elucidate, you assume the position of actors and extol your own virtue by putting down the rest.
It’s nout but antagonism for the purpose of whysoever a troll would do anything. Getting jollies off by calling high horse, or moral corruption.
You make playing in the shit look like fun, and then feign upset when others join you.
Lol, moral judgement from the guy cheering for the murder of innocents. Please just go spend some time on yourself before you talk shit about others. Just because you’re corrupt doesn’t mean that everyone to speak to must also be as corrupt as you.
Come now. When people say strawmanning, they tend to mean that someone has taken the time to at least turn a pile of straw into the shape of a man but you can’t even be arsed to do that. Just standing next to it and calling it a man is even sadder.
You started too many chats and feel like you need to argue them all but you can’t even remember who said what.
“Anyone not fighting my corner is for the murder of innocents” Sounds a bit brain-rotty, fella. A tad corrupt.