U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy rolled out a wide-ranging plan designed to support the trucking industry by cutting regulations, cracking down
(1) Speed limits gone. Workers encouraged to drive more recklessly and given tighter deadlines to meet.
(2) More truck parking for the same reason. Cities filled with parking lots for truckers to sleep instead of being reasonable distance and deadlines for the routes.
None of this “helps truckers”. This helps truck companies exploit their workers more while making the roads less safe and cities covered in more parking lots.
According to the linked article It also includes changes to mandated rest periods to help ensure truckers are even more sleep deprived than they already are.
I did see one good provision, allowing to split the 14 hours of driving time with a 30-180 minute break in the middle. But encouraging the mandatory 10 hour rest periods to instead be 2 5 hour rest periods will make for very sleep deprived humans operating 40,000lb machines at 70+MPH
Tbf eliminating speed limiters (not limits) on trucks is probably genuinely safer, for the same reason most insurance tracking apps dont ding you for speed at all.
Even the law recognizes that it would be unsafe for speed limits to be strictly adhered to when the speed of traffic at large is moving above the speed limit. It’s legal to drive with the speed of traffic for your own safety. Which can often be necessary on the interstate, especially in places where people act like the interstate is Death Race for some reason
Unless were going to put artificial speed limiters on all vehicles at the same time, it would be unsafe to have them. Putting them only on trucks is just asking for 80+mph cars to slam into trucks limited to 65mph
Though that sort of makes sense for traffic moving smoothly and consistently, I thought speed limiters on large/heavy vehicles was mostly due to the braking time/distance rather them fitting amongst speeds of other traffic?
It’s legal to drive with the speed of traffic for your own safety
This is pure misinformation. It is illegal to exceed the speed limit. Simple as that. It is illegal to go 66 in a 65 zone. It is illegal to go 75 in a 70 zone. Anyone who says otherwise is spouting pure fiction.
Now, what you might be referencing is police choosing not to enforce the speed limit on people speeding by a very small margin. That is a conscious choice by police officers, and they can and will find any moving violations to pull someone over if they want to.
This isn’t exactly true in all states, for example CA:
“Under state law, speed limits must be based on the speed of the 85th percentile of those who travel the roadway, which is considered the safe driving speed…”
This fact is used by many to challenge speeding tickets in court.
(1) Speed limits gone. Workers encouraged to drive more recklessly and given tighter deadlines to meet. (2) More truck parking for the same reason. Cities filled with parking lots for truckers to sleep instead of being reasonable distance and deadlines for the routes.
None of this “helps truckers”. This helps truck companies exploit their workers more while making the roads less safe and cities covered in more parking lots.
According to the linked article It also includes changes to mandated rest periods to help ensure truckers are even more sleep deprived than they already are.
I did see one good provision, allowing to split the 14 hours of driving time with a 30-180 minute break in the middle. But encouraging the mandatory 10 hour rest periods to instead be 2 5 hour rest periods will make for very sleep deprived humans operating 40,000lb machines at 70+MPH
Another proud moment for capitalistic innovation
Tbf eliminating speed limiters (not limits) on trucks is probably genuinely safer, for the same reason most insurance tracking apps dont ding you for speed at all.
Even the law recognizes that it would be unsafe for speed limits to be strictly adhered to when the speed of traffic at large is moving above the speed limit. It’s legal to drive with the speed of traffic for your own safety. Which can often be necessary on the interstate, especially in places where people act like the interstate is Death Race for some reason
Unless were going to put artificial speed limiters on all vehicles at the same time, it would be unsafe to have them. Putting them only on trucks is just asking for 80+mph cars to slam into trucks limited to 65mph
Though that sort of makes sense for traffic moving smoothly and consistently, I thought speed limiters on large/heavy vehicles was mostly due to the braking time/distance rather them fitting amongst speeds of other traffic?
It is. Ravioli is talking nonsense.
This is pure misinformation. It is illegal to exceed the speed limit. Simple as that. It is illegal to go 66 in a 65 zone. It is illegal to go 75 in a 70 zone. Anyone who says otherwise is spouting pure fiction.
Now, what you might be referencing is police choosing not to enforce the speed limit on people speeding by a very small margin. That is a conscious choice by police officers, and they can and will find any moving violations to pull someone over if they want to.
This isn’t exactly true in all states, for example CA:
“Under state law, speed limits must be based on the speed of the 85th percentile of those who travel the roadway, which is considered the safe driving speed…”
This fact is used by many to challenge speeding tickets in court.
It’s an ideal conditioning to double down on some self-driving trucks program.
If you was afraid of driving in tesla yourself, now a 16-wheels tesla can drive into you!