• commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Support from the primary source of development is what I’d prefer. That’s where the money is. Mozilla is the only one that could actually have a sizable marketing budget along with employing dozens to hundreds of software developers

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      All of those forks get support from the primary source of development. Do you know what a fork is?

      • commander@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Is your first instinct talking to people is to be a dick? Forks pull changes downstream and hopefully push changes upstream but if you want to see either the core Firefox web browser engine or F-Droid reach more popularity, you need Mozilla support so I would rather support Mozilla directly than any fork

          • commander@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            My bad if I took your words the wrong way. I gave my answer for why I prefer to use the primary application, because of funding, and your response to me sounded like dismissive condescension. You may not have meant condescension but it reads like dismissive condescension to me like I’ve heard plenty of whether in or out of the software industry or academia