• jsomae@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Not sure I really buy this. You have two choices: use it or don’t. If you use it, it will either kill somebody or it won’t; if you don’t use it, it surely won’t kill anybody. The probability of the former case is obviously extraordinarily low, but the probability of the latter causing a death is surely many times lower. The only thing that matters for morality IMO is the ratio of these probabilities, not the absolute difference.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Every time someone steps behind the wheel of the car, the (apparent) chances of them causing a death is so many times higher than writing a name in a Death Note that the latter is completely negligible.

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Would it be immoral to drive a car without utility? Maybe so, but only a little immoral, surely. You don’t deserve to go to jail for taking a joyride around the block.

          I can think of reasons to write a name in a Death Note, like trying to prove to someone that it doesn’t work.

          • jsomae@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            A joyride has its own value. If there were literally no utility – you’re driving a car for no reason, not even to have fun – then yeah it’s immoral, as it just puts people in danger and pollutes the planet.

            As for uses for an impotent death note, fair enough, you’re right.