I found this thought funny. A few years ago everyone was all learn to code so you don’t lose your job! Now there wont be any programming jobs in 10 years. But we will need a lot of manual labor still.

  • TheRealKuni@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    AIs will never be able to abstract away details correctly or design sensible workflows for boutique problems.

    Not the current direction of AI, no. But the field is ever advancing. I won’t be shocked if we see AI capable of these things within my lifetime.

    • Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      A lot of the things that current “AI” is doing exist since the 90s or even earlier. It is just that now the computational capacity is big enough to make much more complex looking inputs and results.

        • Saleh@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I never said that.

          The key point is that we are still limited by what LLMs can and can’t do and fundamentally this is no new technology, just refined technology.

          Think of it like cars. Cars exist since more than a hundred years. A modern car looks much fancier than a car a hundred years ago. But when it comes to the core aspect -moving passengers and cargo around on the ground- modern cars can’t do more than cars from a hundred years ago. They are restricted by the same restriction (usually requiring some sort of road, requiring refueling points…)

          We are pushing the boundaries of what LLMs can do, but there seems no indication, that it actually is a suitable tool for automated programming. LLMs are most likely just cars, where you need something that can fly.

          • TheRealKuni@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 hours ago

            I never said that.

            No, but the person I had replied to, hence the context for my post, did:

            AIs will never be able to abstract away details correctly or design sensible workflows for boutique problems.

            I’m not saying LLMs can, or will be able to, do these things. LLMs are likely a dead-end on the road to AGI. Dead-ends are part of progress. The crossbow eventually hits a dead-end in terms of propelling projectiles with ease faster and harder, but that isn’t the end of projectiles. We got cannons, then hand cannons, and then guns.

            I’m saying if LLMs are cars, AI is “vehicles.” LLM is a subset of the broader category. We have helicopters and planes. They came later than horse carts and cars, but they’re still vehicles. And used some of what we learned building carts and cars, but also with new ideas and concepts.

            And for all we know, someday someone will figure out how to harness the power of gravity like we did with electromagnetism, and we’ll have flying cars. We can’t know, but just because we don’t have the technology now doesn’t mean we never will.