• QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 hours ago

    You aren’t wrong by in this case, nothing needs to be proven by a 3rd party since anyone recently in programming knows how LLMs works. It’s factual.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      LLMs are famously NOT understood, even by the scientists creating them. We’re still learning how they process information.

      Moreover, we most definitely don’t know how human intelligence works, or how close/far we are to replicating it. I suspect we’ll be really disappointed by the human mind once we figure out what the fundamentals of intelligence are.

      • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 hours ago

        They most definitely are understood. The basics of what they’re doing doesn’t change. Garbage in, garbage out.