• nous@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    One step closer to DRM filament spools. Just like the overpriced ink cartridges of 2d printers. The safety and security arguments are always bullshit. This is only about control over what you can do. No other printer has ever had an issue with safety or security with vastly more open designs.

    • ffhein@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 hours ago

      DRM filament spools has already been a thing, XYZprinting tried it but luckily it didn’t catch on and they went bankrupt a few years ago.

      • nous@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Restrictive tech never works when you apply it from the start. You need to capture the market first before you can start to apply that. And that is the road Bamboo labs looks to be heading down. It is the classic playbook:

        1. have some true disruptive innovation in some product that people will actually want to use your products for ✅
        2. mass market your product and get loads of people singing parse about how innovate it is ✅
        3. slowly start to lock down your product, typically behind the guise of safety and security ✅
        4. start to squeeze your customers for as much money as you can with DRM or subscriptions You wont succeed if you skip straight to step 4. But Bamboo have been slowly working their way up to it. It might take a few more years but I can see them eventually wanting DRM filament.