• samc@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Whilst this is very cool, I’m a little concerned about how the pros for “very light rail” basically amount to having better vibes than busses. Not that I even disagree with that premise, but I’d want something more concrete…

    • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      It’s all about the cost savings (in the short term. I don’t know how long such trackwork would last)

      • samc@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 hours ago

        That’s kind of my concern. I’m worried they’re cutting so many corners that the competitive edge over busses all but vanishes and, best case scenario, this ends up being a bizarre PR campaign for public transit.

        • Nalivai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 hours ago

          There are a lot of advantages of tram that you can’t eliminate no matter how much cost you cut. It’s quiet, it’s smooth, it’s electric and doesn’t need big batteries, it’s on separate tracks so it’s predictable, it’s ways easier to operate so thr drivers are easier to find.

          • samc@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I think the article said CVLR would be battery powered to eliminate the need for overhead cables. I’m not saying I believe it is worse than e.g. and electric bus. But even the company producing it seems to struggle to articulate its advantages.

            The reason I care is because I really want more trams in English towns/cities. But not if it’s a pared down version that gives the entire concept a bad image