Would you like some pie? Check it out here: https://piefed.ca/

What is PieFed

PieFed follows a similar format as Lemmy and Mbin. Those that are familiar with Lemmy will find it very similar, with some additional features including topic lists, optional private voting, new mod and admin tools, crosspost de-duplication, community wikis, etc. Thanks to how the fediverse works, you can use either lemmy.ca or piefed.ca to interact freely!

We will put together some guides on our non-profit’s website at some point. In the meantime, we have created [email protected] for us to learn from each other. There is also the official [email protected] community which has a similar purpose.

We have done some testing and we are learning as we go, but please bear with us while this new platform gets going 🙂

Other Links & FAQ

  • mintiefresh@lemmy.caEnglish
    0·
    3 hours ago

    I’m not quite sure what this is and why I should use this over Lemmy … but I’d like to give it a try! lol. Also very cool how the Fediverse allows for different entry points and view the same content.

    Congrats on the expansion!

    • Otter@lemmy.caOPMEnglish
      0·
      2 hours ago

      We’re also learning as we go :) In addition to the features mentioned in the post, a big one for regional instances like ours might be the topic lists (once we set those up anyway)

      Congrats on the expansion!

      Thanks!

  • Troy@lemmy.caEnglish
    0·
    5 hours ago

    Excellent work folks!

    The true power of federation showing itself here. In this case, it’s two software packages with the same server/admin team – which basically future proofs both.

    I’d make a recommendation: have some sort of cross-pollination tool. Basically, pull the database of all subscribed communities on Lemmy.ca and have a bot subscribe to the same on PieFed, and vice versa. Probably easy to do if you have server-side access.

    Furthermore, in the ideal world, “Local” from the Lemmy instance includes the piefed.ca local commuities. This might be a harder ask. The reason would be to prevent bisecting the Local feeds.

    Finally, ideally there is a community migration tool, to cross between Lemmy and PieFed if a community wants to move from one side to the other. This would be a bigger project, but would future proof Fedican even further should either piece of software become badly maintained.

    Well, okay, I just created a year’s worth of work for a programmer. How can I help?

  • viking@infosec.pubEnglish
    0·
    5 hours ago

    Is the API active? I want to use PieFed over Lemmy, but don’t like to join so called “flagship instances”, they always go overboard with moderation at some point.

    So instead of joining piefed.social I signed up with .au, only to find out that the admin never bothered to activate the api, so can’t use any apps, and posts aren’t federating outwards properly.

    Edit: Confirmed working, registration sent.

    Edit 2: Approved within 5 min, thanks for that!

      • viking@infosec.pubEnglish
        0·
        45 minutes ago

        I think it has been there for a bit, but was still in alpha. Preferred.social had it running for a while, that’s their official test instance. But good to see it working!

    • Shadow@lemmy.caMEnglish
      0·
      4 hours ago

      Yep the API is on as of earlier today. It’s not listed in the docs yet, which is probably why the au instance doesn’t have it on.

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.caEnglish
    0·
    12 hours ago

    Nice. Already registered.

    Is there a recommended android app for it?

    I just saw the FAQ section after.

    • Otter@lemmy.caOPMEnglish
      0·
      2 hours ago

      The collapsing of downvoted comments is configurable in the user settings, so it’s possible to disable it or fine tune it to the way you want it. The discussion is still valid for what the default settings should be

      I’m still learning about the karma side, so I don’t want to comment on that yet

    • Jerry on PieFed@feddit.onlineEnglish
      0·
      9 hours ago

      The downvotes and karma do not stop you from saying whatever you want. It just means you have to say it somewhere else. Hence, you are not censored.

  • BedSharkPal@lemmy.caEnglish
    0·
    16 hours ago

    Stuff like this really helps reinforce why the fediverse is the best platform. Portability is no joke.

    • vaguerant@fedia.io
      0·
      22 hours ago

      You might be thinking of Mbin, the other one of the “big three” (more like big one and the other two). Mbin’s biggest differentiating feature is microblog support. It’s hard to boil PieFed down to one main feature compared to Lemmy/Mbin, but anonymous voting and de-duplication of reposts might be the main ones. However, its focus is still on the (Lemmy-style) threaded side of the fediverse.

        • PirateFrog@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
          0·
          19 hours ago

          Out of curiosity, can a community opt out of its comments being bundled with others?

          After seeing it in action, I think that’s actually a nifty feature that most communities and the threadiverse as a whole would benefit from, but I could also potentially foresee a minority of communities not wanting to increase their comments exposure to that degree.

          • Rimu@piefed.socialEnglish
            0·
            5 hours ago

            Thinking a bit bigger - I’d like to see a ‘private community’ feature which limits the visibility of posts inside to community members only. With an optional approval process to join.

            That would take care of the comment bundling issue too.

            • PirateFrog@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
              0·
              3 hours ago

              I think there would still be a desire for the relative in-between setting of just opting out of the bundling. My reasoning is that a community may want to be open to be viewed and commented by anyone so that they continue to grow and have more participation, either by search or random encounter from the /all view, as that allows slow organic growth with relatively few people wanting to go in there and derail conversations.

              With bundling, that community will be seen by far more non-members than ever before if a popular link is posted around to multiple communities, inviting a significant amount of outside participation, and the potential for a much increased need to keep things on topic, or to step in and moderate drama from other communities with wildly different perspectives.

              Without the ability to opt out of bundling, this leaves only the two extremes of potentially unwanted isolation, or potentially unwanted increased outside participation.

              The only other option would be for a community to request their admin defederate from the troublesome community, or from the outside instance entirely, which is using a mallet to solve something that could be done with scalpel.

              I do think the bundling is quite nice overall, and I don’t foresee a problem with it being the default, but I do strongly see the need for that middle ground option to opt-out, personally. The way Lemmy currently operates by default is effectively that middle-ground option that is missing from Piefed.

              • Rimu@piefed.socialEnglish
                0·
                2 hours ago

                the two extremes of potentially unwanted isolation, or potentially unwanted increased outside participation.

                Yes that’s a good way to put it. Thanks.

          • Kichae@lemmy.caEnglish
            0·
            11 hours ago

            Honestly, I think it’s one of the most undercutting, least thought out features in piefed, that focuses entirely on the immediaye convenience of the end user over the health of the discussion groups and servers that make up the network.

            It’s the eating a tub of icing for supper of social media features.