Shit meme, I know.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    You get tired of playing Simon Says when you’re doing a lot of admin stuff at once.

          • TwilightKiddy@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Maybe I’m a bit ignorant, but would it make much of a difference? Whether I authenticate with my own account to get root permissions or directly with root, I still have a string of characters which I use to get root priveleges on my machine. For a single (physical) user machine, that allows me to use a separate password for root. Should be better than using the same one twice, right?

            • toynbee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              24 hours ago

              If root has a password, it’s only one password; everyone who has root access knows the password, which means that anyone can share it with no accountability. If privilege escalation rights are granted instead, it’s easy to see who did what, as well as to contain any kind of compromise (by revoking said rights).

              Also, I think you originally referred to su but sudo allows much more granular control.

              • TwilightKiddy@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                So, we are clearly talking about different environments here. Of course I would not have a password for root in an enterprize setting where you have a lot of different people managing one machine. But for your regular desktop computer with one user, it just complicates things needlessly without providing any benefits.

                • toynbee@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  Your home network is certainly less of a security risk due to both being a smaller target and (usually) needing to have fewer services available or ports open, so I would agree with you it’s acceptable for security to be more lax. Personally, I don’t find sudo to be less convenient than su; it’s even saved me from thoughtlessly running a dangerous command a time or two. Also, I try to keep my home network setup close to my work network until doing so gets in the way. If nothing else, this prevents me from getting used to a different way of doing things.

                  However, it’s your network. If you find that your way works better for you, by all means, configure your system in whatever way seems best to you!

    • Geodad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      If you do multiple admin commands, sudo doesn’t prompt for your password. There’s some time limit before having to re input it.

      Logging in as root is bad security hygiene. You’ll become complacent and leave it logged in at some point. That’s how you get pwnd.

      • Smee@poeng.link
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I want to know more. Looking past running full desktop sessions as root and inputting stupid commands when sudo su, what’s the problem with having a terminal window open and escalated to root?

      • unhrpetby@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        There’s some time limit before having to re input it.

        Inputting a password multiple times into sudo has downsides too. Larger window for attackers to do something like: add a directory to your path, which has a fake sudo in it, and capture your password.