Yes I know China is also technically capitalist but you understand the idea

  • Gsus4@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is easier for China to do because they have high density population centers to connect as rail hubs, which makes the system efficient, cheap and viable, unlike in the US where things are more spread apart…but I have no illusions that in the US anybody would build this even if it was viable.

    • DSTGU@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 hours ago

      This is such a shit argument.

      US has comparable passenger railway service to Australia or worse while having metropolies with roughly the population of that entire country

      aka: excuses

    • Goldholz @lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Dont forget that china is an authorian dictatorship. “Do as your told or else” also makes a lot of things easier

  • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Long term rule by a single party dedicated to improving infrastructure would do that. Let’s not kid ourselves that the CCP is all sunshine and rainbows though.

  • Goldholz @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    China is as communist as the vatican is good for kids

    But sure let us be blinded by propaganda and ignore that the trains in china are held together by ducktape, rails are unsafe and got build with slave labor :)

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      nd ignore that the trains in china are held together by ducktape, rails are unsafe and got build with slave labor :)

      ?? I don’t love china but ignoring the enormous amount of investment they’ve made is silly. that’s what it is, investment. The amount of roads and rail in the last 20 years should give anyone pause, instead of discounting it.

    • GoodOleAmerika@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Don’t think u have travelled to china. Their rail system is fantastic. All out train in US looks like came from steel mill from Philadelphia. Boxy trash and slow af

      • Goldholz @lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Dont need to travel to see that chinese people live in poverty, anything can be done when you are a dictatorship, its corrupt and everything is a scam. Fake meat, fake tofu, tofu drag constructions, 4 billion on a road and all the village got was a gravel path. Where a state teaches kids to hate other nations and disrespect everything for something that happened 80 years ago instead of making sure this does not ever happen again. Where its a national sport to go abroad and harass others. Where the state doesnt care about your stolen things, but if you speak out publicly against it, you will be warned with a kind “take that down, or else”.

        If their electric cars are anything to go by, i dont even want to step on their most modern trains even if they give me trillions of GBP.

        If the regime is supposed to be an example of progress, well guess then we all should go back to european monarchy and imperialism. Europe thrived in the 19th century afterall. Just look at all those rich people living luxurious lifes. All the advancements in science, medicine, transportation, literatur, architectur, social policies, unification of people split appart and more.

        If i were to travel to china they would arrest me on the airport for critisising china and not seeing the CCP as legitimite and supporting taiwan, that being if i would even be allowed to enter the country.

        The USA train system is shit, yes, thats not even on debate. Against that even the russian train system is amazing.

        Also china didnt build its high speed trains on their own. They used EU and japanese tech.

        Japan has the best train system in the entire world, and that without being a supressive, all survaling dictatorship. OP here is comparing shit, scooped from the toilet, to a microwave meal, that got a mediocer plate up. Ofc then in comparison the microwave meal will look better.

        • jaek@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Where a state teaches kids to hate other nations and disrespect everything for something that happened 80 years ago instead of making sure this does not ever happen again. Where its a national sport to go abroad and harass others. Where the state doesnt care about your stolen things, but if you speak out publicly against it, you will be warned with a kind “take that down, or else”.

          Are you talking about the US or china here?

          • Goldholz @lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 hours ago

            I am talking about west taiwan. The US is not teaching its kids to tread and smutter the flags of japan, korea and britain and france. It Doesnt have a whole celebration on their liberation day, where kids charge a fort and “kill the pig bastard invadors”, get taught how to throw granades and be loyal to their party and great leader (atleast not yet). US people that go abroad dont carve racist slurs into religiouse structures, shoot at birds with a sling shot, eat at a restaurant then dump in all the napkins and sauces on the table into the bowl so they are wasted and where the police atleast has to make an effort (yes bad police workers exist but not an entire states deparment) and dont threaten you with prison/disapearing if you dont take down your critique and outcry against them.

            Some US tourists are bad, i dont disagree, but there is a difference between not having manners and deliberately doing damage and disrespect, and just stupidity from an too inward centered society.

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 hours ago

      trains in china are held together by ducktape, rails are unsafe and got build with slave labor :)

      Speaking of being blinded by propaganda…

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      China is a Socialist country run by a Communist party, which is why the overwhelming majority of major Communist orgs recognize it as such. The economy is dominated by the public sector, which controls the large majority of key industries and large firms. They aren’t fully developed post-scarcity Communist yet, but they are developing through Socialism.

      Further, Chinese infrastructure is good. The rails are safe and the trains aren’t held together with duct tape, and they aren’t made with slave labor. This is just chauvanism.

      • WillStealYourUsername@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        They are not socialist in the slightest. That requires the workers to own the means of production, which they do not.

        Edit: To expand on this companies are organized the same way as in capitalism because they are capitalist. Workers at the bottom, management in the middle, and rich capitalists at the top.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 hours ago

          The overwhelming majority of the large firms and key industries are publicly owned and planned, so yes, the workers do own the means of production for the majority of the economy. Further, managers are workers too, not owners. I think you have a very specific view of Socialism that’s exclusionary towards Marxism, for Marxists cooperatives aren’t truly “Socialist” as they are petite bourgeois cells that retain private property and exclusive ownership within, when the goal of Marxist Communisn is the eventual abolition of Private Property, which can only be accomplished by folding all property into the hands of all, through public ownership.

          • WillStealYourUsername@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 hours ago

            The workers have no meaningful power or ownership over their workplaces, so it doesn’t matter how much is publicly owned. I personally will never accept the marxist redefinition of socialism, nor will I ever accept an authoritarian vanguard state.

            I do not want to continue this debate, tankie. It’s never productive for anyone.

  • remon@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Really, your example for the “free market” transportation in the US is Amtrack? … in a car community?

    This is just a tanky shitpost.

    • destructdisc@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      In an anti car community. Considering the US proudly proclaims itself the champion of the free market, yeah, it’s only fitting to use Amtrak as the example.

      • remon@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        yeah, it’s only fitting to use Amtrak as the example.

        Or you know … a car? Because then it would at least be relevant to this community.

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    For some reason, people still act like capitalism and socialism (or communism) are mutually exclusive, that an economy must be one or the other. But if you look at essentially every national economy on the planet today, they are all some mix of the socialist mode of production (when the means of production are owned by the government, or a group of workers, or a community) and the capitalist mode of production (when the means of production are owned by a private individual or group of investors, operating for a profit). Almost no economy is exclusively one or the other.

    It is true that in most countries with robust high speed rail, there is significant government involvement, like planning and building infrastructure, subsidies, or just providing rail travel as a public service. I definitely think that for a national rail service network to work, you need to do some planning. Here in the US, government and planning are bad words, but clearly they needn’t be.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Social programs are not Socialism. The government doing stuff is not Socialism. You cannot take aspects of a society out of their context and analyze them discretely. The United States does not have a “Socialist” millitary. Socialism is a mode of production determined by public ownership being the principle aspect of the economy, ie large firms and key industries being firmly public, as opposed to Capitalism where private ownership is the principle aspect.

      • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Socialism is a mode of production determined by public ownership

        That’s what I’m talking about. Essentially every national economy on the planet includes at least some socialist production. I can’t think of a single national economy on the Earth where the production of all goods and services is carried out exclusively by privately owned, for-profit firms. Can you?

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Public Ownership is not Socialism itself, but a component of a Socialist economy. An economy where public ownership controls the large firms and key industries, ie has genuine political control, is Socialist.

          No system is purely public or private, hence the line of demarcation between Socialist countries and Capitalist countries is where political power is vested.

          • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            No system is purely public or private

            I know, that’s what I’ve been saying. That’s my whole point.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 day ago

              You’re conflating public ownership in general with Socialism, though, which is wrong, and leads to wrong conclusions like thinking the US Postal Service is a “socialist part of a Capitalist economy.” All systems are mixed, what determines if a system is Capitalist or Socialist is which aspect is primary in the economy.

              • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Socialism is an economic and political philosophy encompassing diverse economic and social systems characterised by social ownership of the means of production, as opposed to private ownership.

                Social ownership can take various forms, including public, community, collective, cooperative, or employee.

                Source

                Go back to my original comment where I described the socialist mode of production:

                the socialist mode of production (when the means of production are owned by the government, or a group of workers, or a community)

                • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I understand the Wikipedia entry, I read Marx, Engels, Lenin, and countless other Marxists. I even read anarchists like Kropotkin and so forth. You are confusing public ownership in general with Socialism as a Mode of Production, which the Wikipedia entry hints at, but you lack the context to understand that, which is why I am telling you.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Socialism and communism are not when the state does stuff.

      Socialism/communism is workers owning the means of production. This is exceedingly rare and constantly attacked whenever it exists. Almost every state is overwhelmingly capitalist. That’s a primary purpose of the state.

  • Justas🇱🇹@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Spain is better at building high speed rail infrastructure than China is. The problem is not the economic system, it’s what lobby groups are in charge.

      • Cypher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I guess Japan and Korea must be communists then with their extensive and reliable train networks.

          • Cypher@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Ahhh yes, recognising the state that doesn’t shoot ‘defectors’ and run concentration camps is better is ‘coloniser morality’.

            Also how exactly was South Korea colonised? Other than by Imperial Japan of course.

            A democratically elected government was assisted in repelling invasion from an authoritarian regime.

            Sounds familiar to some current events really.

            • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 hours ago

              South Korea is an American vassal state. South Korea’s military is fully under the control of the US military. I know of no other purportedly sovereign country with such a setup.

              • Cypher@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 hours ago

                South Korea is a democracy and North Korea is an authoritarian dictatorship.

                You’re tankie scum if you think the North is better.

            • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              19 hours ago

              They were bombed to shit by the US whose military is still occupying them to this day…

              of course the state that did that and wants to maintain any veneer of democracy would twist itself in knots to convince you that it was the right thing to do.

      • massive_bereavement@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Oh, the old “make the trains run on time” has come back in use?

        Jokes aside, the CCP push for infrastructure investment in both renewables, public mass transportation is enviable, but also it comes with a cost:

        https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/beyond-trafficking-and-slavery/hidden-in-plain-sight-forced-labour-constructing-china/

        That said, some of our countries might be in a slippery slope towards a similar situation (I mean nearly non-payed labor or debt slavery already exist in some countries).

  • Donkter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    And all the libertarians cry about is how it’s not real free markets and that’s why we don’t have nice trains and public education etc. not understanding that it’s government funding and regulations that’s just barely keeping everything (pun intended) on the rails in the first place.

    • blarghly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I always find it strange when I find someone in the wild who likes Amtrak. I have only heard and experienced horror stories.

      • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        They’ve been solid for me. I used to take the Acela between NYC and Baltimore all the time. It was faster than flying when comparing door-to-door times, cheaper, no fucking TSA, and it had a bar car. Also took one from Portland to BC recently which was legit.

      • Tony Bark@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I’ve ridden on Amtrak’s business class on the NEC or sleepers outside thbide corridor since I was a child. So, I have a bit of a bias.

        • themadcodger@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          I took the Empire Builder from Seattle to Chicago, and then I forget which through W Va up to Philly. It was a great few days watching the countryside roll by.