No offense.
But literally no one else but Israel has the motive and means to know exactly where an Palestinian aid ship is to attack it with drones.
Its like watching a ship filled with Burger King hamburgers get assaulted with Big Macs, and you want to say there’s no evidence the attack was a product of McDonald’s.
Who else hates Burger King and has Big Macs?
Who else hates Palestine and has drones?
It’s certainly not an individual like the hamburglar as the attack was too sophisticated, so that doesn’t leave a lot of other plausible explanations does it?
I’m pointing out the painfully obvious fact that of the 15 or so countries that have the technology, information, and resources needed to conduct this kind of attack, only one also has a motive and enough budget to spend on the needless destruction of supplies and aid.
Which other country would pay the bill for this kind of attack? Unless you can name someone else, there’s only one answer I can think of.
Wikipedia also has a bunch of articles about how OJ Simpson was found innocent of murdering his wife. And thats enough to convince you it wasn’t him?
That statement is correct at the time of writing as it is still not confirmed who exactly did it, but there is no denial that it was an ally to Israel if they were not directly involved. Still, whoever did it is a huge a-hole and there is no excuse for those actions.
There’s no evidence that this attack was a product of israel
All just guesses
There’s no evidence that this comment is written by a hasbara operative.
yeah it was just a random drone attack. Happens all the time, I think the reptilians are behind this
Sigonella is right there, there’s no way they don’t know who did it
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_Air_Station_Sigonella
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_Radio_Transmitter_Facility_Niscemi
AIPAC isnt going to fuck you bro
AIPAC needs to be forced to register as a foreign agent. Enough of these clowns cosplaying being “American”
They’re a tiny percentage controlling our government.
![https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/cad4a6cd-6f55-4c62-bf33-14869f677ccf.png]
No offense. But literally no one else but Israel has the motive and means to know exactly where an Palestinian aid ship is to attack it with drones.
Its like watching a ship filled with Burger King hamburgers get assaulted with Big Macs, and you want to say there’s no evidence the attack was a product of McDonald’s.
Who else hates Burger King and has Big Macs? Who else hates Palestine and has drones?
It’s certainly not an individual like the hamburglar as the attack was too sophisticated, so that doesn’t leave a lot of other plausible explanations does it?
The wikipedia article sais that we don’t know. Should I trust you mpre than a wikipedia article?
I’m not saying anything.
I’m pointing out the painfully obvious fact that of the 15 or so countries that have the technology, information, and resources needed to conduct this kind of attack, only one also has a motive and enough budget to spend on the needless destruction of supplies and aid.
Which other country would pay the bill for this kind of attack? Unless you can name someone else, there’s only one answer I can think of.
Wikipedia also has a bunch of articles about how OJ Simpson was found innocent of murdering his wife. And thats enough to convince you it wasn’t him?
That statement is correct at the time of writing as it is still not confirmed who exactly did it, but there is no denial that it was an ally to Israel if they were not directly involved. Still, whoever did it is a huge a-hole and there is no excuse for those actions.
For all we know it could’ve been any country. There are many countries with a interest in causing instability.
“Not confirmed who exactly did it” and “there os no denial” do form quite the contrast