You haven’t answered 1 and 2 to my knowledge, you’ve been cagey and evasive. I would like you to answer all 3, complete with sources, in a single comment. That would save us all the most time. If you’d prefer, you can directly link where you’ve answered and sourced your answers for 1 and 2 if you wish to stick by those answers, but based on parsing your comment history, you haven’t done so yet.
I asked you the same question here and here, and I’ll do so again in simpler and clearer terms here:
What is going on in the re-education camps in Xinjiang, with sources?
What is the extent, ie the scale, of the re-education camps in Xinjiang, with sources?
Why do they exist in the first place, with sources?
1 and 2 have been answered previously, do you want the official answer for 3?
No they haven’t.
You haven’t answered 1 and 2 to my knowledge, you’ve been cagey and evasive. I would like you to answer all 3, complete with sources, in a single comment. That would save us all the most time. If you’d prefer, you can directly link where you’ve answered and sourced your answers for 1 and 2 if you wish to stick by those answers, but based on parsing your comment history, you haven’t done so yet.
clear answers, facts, sources are not evasive.
maybe you just don’t like the answers you are receiving.
I’d like to recieve the answers to begin with, but I’ll take this final evasion as an admission of your being outright unable to answer my questions.
if you think clear answers, facts and sources are evasion, then you’re not going to be satisfied with any response.
Mind showing me where you gave me clear answers, facts, and sources to my questions? I’m not satisfied because I haven’t recieved those.
they’re in your comment history, you’ll probably be able to find them pretty easily.
The podcast by The Economist with 2 unverified testemonials, and the numbers you never gave proper links to other than to indirect articles?