absolute minimum is around half a million detainee in total (ccp numbers until 2019), and most outside estimates place the number closer to 1-2 million uyghur detainees.
Bear in mind that this is not some static equation, mass detainment started almost 10 years ago at this point and has been occurring for a decade. with detainment ongoing and the CCP long having stopped sharing specific information, it’s going to be hard to get specific numbers past 2019(the half a million number) for years to come.
Lmao so you lied by implying this was a separate government when it’s a branch of the CPC? Sooo…are they brave truth tellers or lying chinese communists?
Wdym occupation. Xinjiang (formerly Xiyu) has been incorporated territory of the PRC since its foundation, and part of China since (conservatively) the Tang dynasty.
Ok, so the violent religious reactionaries needed to be dealt with, but with a more nuanced approach. What should it be? What would be faster and gentler, but also effective?
The decades-long occupation pretty much never works and just engenders more revolution, so I wouldn’t recommend that route.
also, the “violent religious reactionaries” is a bit of a leap from the sheer volume of detainees.
I think the violent ones should be dealt with much differently than the non-violent activists, but they are apparently treated the same.
The sheer volume being how many?
The sheer volume being how many?
absolute minimum is around half a million detainee in total (ccp numbers until 2019), and most outside estimates place the number closer to 1-2 million uyghur detainees.
Bear in mind that this is not some static equation, mass detainment started almost 10 years ago at this point and has been occurring for a decade. with detainment ongoing and the CCP long having stopped sharing specific information, it’s going to be hard to get specific numbers past 2019(the half a million number) for years to come.
You keep dropping numbers like this without sourcing them.
you’ll have to look through the other comments for the sources, I’ve had to drop that same source like four times now.
And where did you get those numbers?
The xinjiang high people’s protectorate
Source that the xinjiang high people’s protectorate made all of those claims?
they are the source.
Then provide it
Source that that’s even a thing that exists?
https://web.archive.org/web/20240409125822/http://www.xj.jcy.gov.cn/jwgk/gzbg/
it’s in Chinese.
every province in China has a local government, so this is the local government of xinjiang.
it’s very similar to having a state government in the US.
Lmao so you lied by implying this was a separate government when it’s a branch of the CPC? Sooo…are they brave truth tellers or lying chinese communists?
no, that’s all still incorrect.
Where did you find your link?
Also I don’t see anything on that link suggesting what you’re claiming.
Wdym occupation. Xinjiang (formerly Xiyu) has been incorporated territory of the PRC since its foundation, and part of China since (conservatively) the Tang dynasty.
that commenter was referencing Afghanistan, not xinjiang.
I see, thanks for clarification
Ok, so the violent religious reactionaries needed to be dealt with, but with a more nuanced approach. What should it be? What would be faster and gentler, but also effective?