The European Comission is looking for feedback on forcing retention of metadata from all communication services for “a reasonable period of time”, for purposes of criminal investigation!
Which means encrypted messaging without a backdoor would be illegal if this passes! That’s a slippery slope!
That basically means an attacker with some skill could read any data from anyone (correct me if I’m wrong but I think you can infer the content from the metadata in 90% of cases)
For more detail on why it’s bad, click the link below and read literally any feedback comment.
Go ahead and give some feedback! You can do so even if you are not an EU citizen!
https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/14680-Impact-assessment-on-retention-of-data-by-service-providers-for-criminal-proceedings-/_en
@soatok @echo_pbreyer @privacy @technology
#Europe #privacy #encryption
It depends on how many layers of obfuscation you are looking to deal with. There always needs to be some publicly shared token to initiate a connection, even if that’s only the public key of a asymmetric key pair to a 3rd party auth system.
There are ways to do it, but part of the difficulty is there are so many ways to do it that coming to an agreed method is like herding cats.
@ShellMonkey Be careful, obfuscation isn’t encryption!
And no, there doesn’t need to be a publicly shared token! Take a look at how simplexchat does it!
https://simplex.chat/