• Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Let’s just pretend we environmental impact is a negligible factor to save like 35 minutes on a 5-6 hour trip, Toronto - NYC, one way or another (have this guy ever been to an airport?)é

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      I see “3” daily departures from NYC for Toronto by train, sort of. Travel time is 12h, 29h, 34h,

      For flying, I see 24 direct flights on the first page of my search, all under 2h, all cheaper than train

      Or an 8h drive

      Even as someone who really wants to take the train, that’s not even under consideration

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      I’m someone who prefers to drive because I don’t like people much and flying is now a miserable experience, but yes, when you tally up all the time it takes to go to the airport, park, go through security, and then fly (especially if there’s a layover tacked on), you really don’t save much time in the end.

      If I were a European and train service was more feasible, I’d go that route. It’s really only a convenient option on the East Coast here.

      To me, flying is just not worth it.

        • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          The externalities are so terrifyingly large, “radiation exposure” seems like a sociopathic thing to worry about.

          • acargitz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            For sociopaths who already don’t care about the externalities (billionaires and the like), their own asses getting irradiated might be a convincing argument.