China’s firewall plays a crucial role in shaping the country’s digital landscape, preventing foreign intervention, and maintaining national security. While often criticized in the West, the firewall provides China with the ability to control information flow, shield its population from foreign influence, and protect domestic media.
deleted by creator
Cupcake here didn’t vet a single thing. You looked at a subscriber count and the title of the video. Please fuck off forever
You haven’t ‘vetted’ anything, obviously it’s a pro-China piece from the title alone.
It’s infantile to ignore a piece because you’ve already made up your mind, based on your own ‘reputable’ western propaganda bubble. You’re allowed to read things you think you’ll disagree with, learn to actually think critically on your own.
deleted by creator
It’s not a “source”
It’s a YouTube video. An opinion. You determine whether that opinion is trustworthy or not by watching the video and seeing if the conclussions he puts forward make sense to you.
Or you can just ignore it and say it isn’t true because it’s not pre approved by the Cia.
deleted by creator
Lmao did you vet all of these comments before reading them too? What if one of them persuaded you?! OMG YOU MIGHT ALREADY BE COMPROMISED
Uno reverse, you walking projector
Also projection. You’re so up your own ass you’ve become an small and dense enough object to tear through the fabric of space and become a blackhole of being an ignorant little shit
Your entire worldview is that of a self-contained circulating system of raw sewage. There’s literally zero reason to take anything you say with anything but negative credibility and seriousness.
Of course I could be persuaded to believe in things that aren’t true
I used to believe the United States was a good country
Literally a 40k quote: Blessed is the mind too narrow for doubt
And the related one: “An open mind is like a fortress with its gates unbarred and unguarded.”
Watch the video and find out, dumbass
Tell me why the New York Times is a trustworthy source.
deleted by creator
Then why don’t we see you in the comment sections of the posts for articles about the new york times applying the exact same methodology you’ve been applying here?
If anything everyone should take what you, a one month old account, that sprang out of nowhere, with a whole mountain of salt grains for any assertion you’ve put out.
Then name one source you trust and why
Again, it’s an opinion piece. They’re giving an opinion, which you could possibly reasonably disagree with if you’d actually watched it.
I don’t care if you trust it, just think critically about the issue.