• rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      You know, you and Black Mirror are laughing, But my wife sends me links to products off TikTok all the fucking time and I’m not even on TikTok.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          24 days ago

          I would, but they’d probably recommend her a good lawyer.

          edit: even worse, I look at the fucking stuff and go ohh fuck that’s nice! Wait, I don’t want that… but wow, and it’s cheap too…

          • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            24 days ago

            It doesn’t matter how much you loose financially. It’s not worth it to be tied down to someone who makes you so miserable.

            And its better to do it sooner than later. Or you’ll regret it later.

    • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      i mean people already do this thanks in part to the hyperindividualism where people build their identity through the brands they consume.

      An example, i only knew about MCU latest movie because a friend i have is walking MCU ad, he couldnt stop talking about going to watch this Thunderbolts movie. In farming on one side you have guys who are john deere extremists and in the other side you got massey ferguson fundamentalists, rarely you find someone that objectively uses both.

      heck people build their identities based on the car brand they drive or the console brand they play instead and thus become walking ads for the brands.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      –cut to living room–
      Stephen: Hey guys I’m going to the kitchen anyone need anything?

      Rachel: I’ll take a diet coke, in a glass with ice.

      Stevie: Ohh that sounds refreshing

      Greg: I’ll take a fanta, glass, ice

      Stephen: Orange or that new vanilla cherry flavor?

      Greg: Ohh you have that, I though it was sold out everywhere! Yes PLEASE!

      –cut to kitchen–

      • stephen gets 4 frost glasses from the freezer places perfect icecubes to just above the rim and starts to fill each glass.

      –cut to glasses, close microphone on the scene–

      • the coke products fizz into the glasses magically creating just enough head as the ice clinks down into the glass. You head an almost subliminal sigh of pleasure plays just barely in the white noise of the carbonation.

      –cut to living room–

      • stephen walks in with a tray of glasses stephen: ohh I forgot mine!

      *replays the scene again with a vanilla coke and he puts a sprig of mind on the glass.

  • Feydaikin@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    It’s the way of all subscription based entertainment. To increase profit eventually the choice comes down higher subscription fees or introduce ads.

    And once ads are there, it’s a one-way street. Until adpocalypse.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      If it’s in your systems in an open format it’s yours, if it’s outside your systems or wrapped in some kind of locked format that forces you to go through somebody else’s software it’s de facto theirs.

      Due to my own experience in software development with 3rd party solutions from way back, I never adhered to Streaming solutions (even though I was tempted) and always stuck to getting my entertainment in a media format I controlled (legitimately for a long as I could, not so much once even physical media started having DRM) because I was aware that it’s risky to outsource so much control over one aspect of what you do (in this case entertainment) to an entity which, frankly, sees you as nothing else that microscopic fraction of their bottomline.

      (The funny bit is that if Netflix would sell me their Series in an open file format that I could download and at a reasonable price, I would have sent lots of money their way, same as I spent lots of money on DVDs and even VHS tapes back in the day. In fact all throughout that period I was doing something like that for games: as soon as I discovered GOG with their DRM-free downloadable installers, I started acquiring all my games by buying them from GOG)

      In the fullness of time, my caution seems to have been proven right.

  • onlooker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    Previously, on Best of Netflix: price increases, flip-flopping on their account sharing stance (currently on “don’t do that”), removing shows without warning, iffy show recommendations by their algorithm, inability to watch shows offline etc.

    So, if you’re not already pirating at this point I have to ask: what are you waiting for? Seriously, why are you giving these companies money?

  • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    Question, what even is a “Generative AI ad”?

    Is the lead actress of the horror movie I’m watching look into the camera and tell me about the new coca-cola while she waits for the monster to come get her?

      • Scrollone@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        Plex is completely enshittified at this point.

        • You need to pay if you want to share your movies with friends
        • They spy your watch list, and share what you watched with your friends by sending them emails
        • They released a new half broken app
        • They removed the “party” option that let you watch a movie together with friends remotely
        • They’re actively trying to hide the personal streaming features in order to push people to their legally (and ad-riddled) streamed movies

        So Jellyfin is now the best solution afaik

      • Carrot@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        25 days ago

        For those with preexisting lifetime memberships, things haven’t changed yet (outside of basically trying to make Plex a social media thing), but in my eyes it’s only a matter of time. Made the switch to Jellyfin this week after having used Plex for 5 years. If I wanted to invite new users to join my server, they’d have to pay $2 a month to be able to watch on their phone instead of the one-time payment of $5.

      • ArchAengelus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        They made it so server owners need a plex pass to stream to anyone outside the same LAN. Or the clients need to pay $2 a month if the server owner doesn’t have one

        • Grapho@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          2 dollars just for providing the tunnel service, mind you. A subscription for glorified port forwarding.

          • kratoz29@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            25 days ago

            The glorified port forwarding issue is even worthless if you are a CGNAT user, and it is 2025 so I’ll assume everyone is.

      • nfreak@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        Yep, big time. Basically dead at this point, forcing payments to stream your own content.

        I started setting up my homelab last month and immediately went to Jellyfin because Plex just screamed “corporate bullshit” to me. Sure enough, it was the right call.

        • kratoz29@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          Basically dead at this point

          For free users though, there are some of us who paid for Lifetime Plex Pass tier a long time ago… I do wonder if Lifetime really means forever though.

    • toastmeister@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      I pay for an emby share personally.

      Plex/emby/jellyfin, there are a ton of paid shares out there that are cheap.

      • Oniononon@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        Aliexpress summer sale started. Getting a 150 eur ryzen mini pc and slapping some hdds onto it for a cheap media server/nas with 4 digit nas specs.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          That’s pretty much the self-made home media system I’ve upgraded to some months ago, only mine has an N100 CPU (which is nicer from a power consumption point of view for an always on system since its TDP is 15W).

          It’s wired to my TV, running Kodi on the foreground, runs qBittrorrent on the background over an always on VPN and serves as my home NAS.

          From Aliexpress I got a wireless remote that let’s me control Kodi as if it was a TV box, so from my sofa I handle it as a TV box whilst from my PC I can ssh to it and to any computer kind of management.

          Probably one of my best purchases ever.

          • Oniononon@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            25 days ago

            So far it’s; genmachine 5500u pc barebones, will get random ram and steam decks 256gb ssd, fedora server and some rabdom twin drive hdd enclosure with used 4tb disks to start with. 8gb of ram should be plenty as going 16gb ddr4 to 32gb ddr5 made no difference at all on my main gaming/dev/3d rig.

            Total cost: 158 for mini pc, twin drive enclosure 60, 4tb drives: 50 eur each, ram 15 eur or around entry level twin drive nas price.

            Id if there’s any build thread to post about “i shoved an external drive up the ass of a chinese mini pc and labelled it homelab”

            • ArchAengelus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              25 days ago

              Honestly, those are the most interesting builds to me. As an American, I’m waiting for tariffs to die before buying stuff of AliExpress, but one can hope.

      • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        I pay for an emby share personally.

        I read this as “enby share” and thought, “Is that like a queer polyamorous social group? If so, I want in.”

        (BTW I use emby share to pirate too, so no need to explain. My brain just expects the word “enby” first.)

      • Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        Do I misunderstand emby or does it just not seem like a good deal on the basis of it being an ongoing subscription? I use the free version of emby and it’s really great. There was at least one feature that required payment to unlock. I like emby already and when I tried using jellyfin, the core features that were on both it and the free version of emby worked far less reliably and the paid feature on emby that was free on Jellyfin, worked extremely unreliably. Obviously resources and development had been spent to make something that worked very well and their paid feature probably would too. I use emby to make it easier to cast media locally to my chromecast and to access media on my computer, from my phone in my bedroom, so for me, it’s a fancy file browser and media player. The feature I wanted was to do with free to air tv streaming and I was thinking I’d be happy to pay for the Emby software to unlock this since they made good software that works. But here’s the thing, it’s FREE to air TV and yet they want me to pay, ongoing, in a perpetual arrangement to use it. I don’t get it. I use it to play media, but the media is my media stored on my machines. I understand software development isn’t free, I was happy to pay ONCE, but why would I keep paying when they don’t actually produce the media I use it to play? That seemed unjustifiable.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          If you were going to pay, the one-time $119 sub is the only thing that makes sense.

          Historically, I’ve never been sad about a lifetime software purchase. That said, none of them continued to work unchanged for a lifetime, but I’ve always felt I’ve gotten my money out of them.

          In the end, everyone eventually enshitifies their product to make more money.

          Playon stopped supporting their old model which just stopped working slowly over the following year as streaming companies changed their tech, while their “new product” which only had monthly fees kept working. I used it for enough years it ended up being something like $2 a month.

          Plex nixed their plugins, then screwed over their offline viewing and offline sharing, then their watch together. My original lifetime was somewhere around $70 and I’ve used them for 15 years, that’s $4.60 a year :)

        • AtariDump@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          Now with paragraphs.

          Do I misunderstand emby or does it just not seem like a good deal on the basis of it being an ongoing subscription?

          I use the free version of emby and it’s really great. There was at least one feature that required payment to unlock.

          I like emby already and when I tried using jellyfin, the core features that were on both it and the free version of emby worked far less reliably and the paid feature on emby that was free on Jellyfin, worked extremely unreliably.

          Obviously resources and development had been spent to make something that worked very well and their paid feature probably would too.

          I use emby to make it easier to cast media locally to my chromecast and to access media on my computer, from my phone in my bedroom, so for me, it’s a fancy file browser and media player.

          The feature I wanted was to do with free to air tv streaming and I was thinking I’d be happy to pay for the Emby software to unlock this since they made good software that works. But here’s the thing, it’s FREE to air TV and yet they want me to pay, ongoing, in a perpetual arrangement to use it. I don’t get it.

          I use it to play media, but the media is my media stored on my machines. I understand software development isn’t free, I was happy to pay ONCE, but why would I keep paying when they don’t actually produce the media I use it to play? That seemed unjustifiable.

  • obsidianfoxxy7870@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    I totally get the anger with Netflix. I fucking hate them as a filmmaker. But I really don’t think a long term solution is pirating content.

    BUY CONTENT YOU LIKE

    Is it more expensive? Of course it is, that’s part of an equitable society. Also it means you end up with content you really like and not a bunch of junk.

    • auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      Nah fuck that. Ignore this guy, everyone pirate everything until they fix it again.

      People don’t pirate music, guess why?

    • atrielienz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      I was. Until they made that so difficult and time consuming that the barrier to entry was too high. Not because of the price. But because of availability. When Google play music was a thing? I bought music. When streaming took over I moved to Bandcamp. But Bandcamp doesn’t have everything. There’s no music stores anymore where I can just go and buy music. It’s all Amazon and similar.

      I’d love to own the ghibli collection. But to get it I have to buy the DVS’s (and have a DVD player to play them on), or I have to pirate them. No digital store front seems to have the whole collection. This happens all the time with media that I’m willing to pay for.

        • atrielienz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          I’d love to know what you do when you can’t find a DVD still in print? Media companies like Disney and Paramount etc have been deliberately limiting the number of DVD’s and other physical formats available, putting whole movies and series “in the vault” for the purposes of manufacturing scarcity. Piracy is largely a matter of economic affordability and ease of access. I can pirate. The point is when I had these titles available to buy, I bought media rather than pirate it. I preferred to. And when it’s not easily available or locked to specific services I’m boycotting etc there’s few avenues left. I can appreciate that you were trying to give me a legal avenue to obtain what I want, but I feel like you missed the forest for the trees here.

      • Bonesince1997@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        25 days ago

        Along with bandcamp, there’s Qobuz, 7digital, and HDTracks that I can recommend for digital music downloads. Those other three often have what bandcamp does not, much more common songs. Many in 24-bit.

      • Carrot@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        25 days ago

        I pay for the streaming services, but don’t stream. Maybe this is me trying to justify “theft”, but how I like to think about it is this: I pay for the streaming services. I have the technical know-how to either download directly or rip (screen record) any shows I want from any of the popular services, as well as to write the scripts myself to roughly automate this. I also have spare computers to do this 24/7. However, it’s actually better for the streaming service that I don’t do this myself, since they still get my money without me using the bandwidth. I pay for AMC Stubs A-list but don’t often see the movies in theaters, so I don’t feel bad pirating new releases. As for movies/shows not on streaming services, I could buy used dvd/blurays, rip them myself, then sell them back, but that would ultimately result in a near-net-zero cost anyway, so what’s the point of going through all that? In my mind, as long as I’m paying for these subscriptions pirating feels like it’s no longer an ethical/moral gray area.

        Note that I only do this because I can afford to. When I was younger, I would pirate everything without worrying because if I couldn’t afford to pay the streaming service, they didn’t lose a potential customer if I pirated anyway. Now that I am better off and would definitely be paying for these subscriptions, I might as well, but still get to own the content I’m paying for. 120TB and counting!

        • Grapho@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          Yeah, just buy yourself a dvd/blu-ray player just to rip it, wait for the disk to arrive, connect it to your computer and set aside the time to rip it (if you even know how).

          Such a reasonable alternative to setting up radarr one time and watching the movie immediately. Can’t have a digital storefront where I get to own my digital copy.

        • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          That is extremely inconvenient and jist feels wrong. There’s no reason a digital file has to be tied to an inconvenient, small-volume media.

    • nfreak@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      I’ll buy music directly from artists on bandcamp and such, especially since they offer unlimited DRM-free FLAC downloads, but any other media at this point is just absurdly inconvenient. Everything’s just tied to dogshit streaming platforms.

      If there were a DRM-free option to buy and download movies or shows for life, I’d definitely be buying what I can here and there. But everything is so locked down or encumbered with other bullshit that it’s not a viable option.

    • RedSnt 👓♂️🖥️@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      To some extent you’re right. There’d be less content if nobody paid. But imagine current society without treats. I don’t know if capitalism without “panem et circenses” would start to crumble real fast.

    • Oniononon@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      I buy vinyl and buy flac music from artists I like.

      But if your digital content isnt available in my region imma pirate it and assume the racist fucks have enough money.

    • Paddy66@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      If there was a Bandcamp for film and TV, then I would buy stuff there. DRM free.

      But until then…

    • DV8@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      It’s made intentionally hard though. Try buying The Expanse Blu Ray collection for example. Season 4 literally only comes region A locked, and is not playable on non modified Blu-ray players if you’re in the EU. I was excited to buy it after getting a decent Blu-ray player so I could rewatch it with my partner who hasn’t seen it, but something dumb like that does put a damper on things, so we haven’t even bothered with it, despite downloading it.

    • Majestic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      IMO focus on purchasing physical content from creators or distributors who NEED to get paid.

      It’s one thing to foolishly throw money at these big companies for blurays of an already very successful series while they’re throwing their old libraries in the trash or ‘the vault’ or just shoveling most of their money towards low quality reality garbage.

      It’s another to buy a Criterion or BFI or Vinegar Syndrome bluray of something out of print that they need to recoup the costs of restoring and scanning.

      If someone buys a bluray of an MCU movie they are a chump, firstly for liking that stuff, secondly for giving Disney more money for it when those things already earn piles of cash in theaters and that alone would be enough to keep them paying salaries and producing that stuff.

      Spend money on independent film-makers/releases, on restorations, on series you like on the verge of cancellation.

      Sadly I think the conclusion is already written, physical media’s days are numbered, the big companies are going to shut down the overwhelming majority of bluray and dvd production within 5-10 years is my feeling because why sell you for $20-$30 a copy of something when they can get your rent in the form of streaming monthly payments for the rest of your natural life?

      And best of all with the rent they can push ads which further increase their revenue. That bluray is a one-time payment, ads for watching the movie on streaming are a continual revenue stream. I predict that they will either have completely killed off ad-free tiers of streaming to push most of their audience into an even bigger and more valuable ad pool to sell to advertisers OR the prices of the ad-free tiers will grow dramatically away from the ad-supported tiers. Right now it’s a few bucks a month, I suspect within 10 years it will be 170-300% the cost of the ad-supported version.