• Holli25@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 month ago

      They are responsible for getting both “data protection adequacy agreements” for the US thrown out in court (see Max Schrems).

    • A Wild Mimic appears!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Max Schrems and his team have done a lot of good regarding user rights in the face of giants like meta. I’m pretty sure that at least a handful of Meta employees regulary have nightmares because of NOYB.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Under Article 80, the GDPR foresees that non-profit organizations can take action or represent users.

      Emphasis mine. Just in case anyone is still denying that Euro-English is a thing. It provides for it, which implies it anticipats it, so if we get rid of unnecessary Romance it foresees it. Plans for, as Wikipedia puts it, but not only the French etymology (prevoir) works, there’s also German vorhersehen/vorsehen which collapse when you calque them into English. Gives Brits all kinds of headaches, they were writing lots of huffy memos before Brexit.