• AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    Self-preservation is a morally acceptable reason to not do something unless a reasonable case can be made that you should do that thing.

    It’s not cowardly to not throw your life away for no good reason. Unless he had a moral reason to go, he had a moral right to not go.

    Conscription produces bad soldiers and it’s morally reprehensible to conscript soldiers to invade a country that does not pose a threat to you.

    • steeznson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      Yeah I broadly agree. Idk when I was younger (and doing a lot more psychedelics) I had this idea that all soldiers were murders and being a conscientious objector was a moral imperative.

      I’ve softened that view the older I’ve gotten but certain wars, like you point out, such as Vietnam or Iraq where the country isn’t posing a threat probably retain that same moral calculus.

      It is different when your country is under threat like if you were Ukranian. However I’m not sure what I’d do if I were put in that situation. To be honest I might also try to chase self-preservation over anything else.

      • Zealousideal_Fox_900@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Yeah “all soldiers are murderers regardless of whom they fight for/against” is a level of delusional mushrooms I can only dream of. If I was Ukrainian, or even in a position to volunteer to fight in the foreign legion I would. It reminds me a bit of 1956 Hungary. Listening to their final radio broadcast, is to put it mildly, incredibly saddening. Fuck the USSR, and the tankie stupidity about it and their “tHe WeSt”