• loutr@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    That’s just not true, chatgpt & co are hugely popular, which is a big part of the issue.

      • gradual@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        47 minutes ago

        Analogies are fallacies. All they do is reveal that you can’t argue the merits of the topic at hand, so you need to derail and distract by pivoting to something else.

        Now we need to debate the accuracy of your analogy, which is never 1:1, instead of talking about what we were talking about previously.

        You’re also arguing with the wrong person. You should be talking to the person who argued “AI is a negative because pretty much nobody likes it” instead of the person who says it’s not true that “nobody likes it.”

        You’re literally only looking for an angle to shit on AI so you can fit in with the average idiots.

        AI discussion at this point are litmus tests for who is average that lets other average people do their thinking for them. It really puts into perspective how much popular opinion should be scrutinized.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Hugely popular, mostly with a bunch of dorks nobody likes that much.

      People are getting the message now, but when it first came out, there were so many posts about what ChatGPT had to say about the topic, and the posters never seemed to understand why nobody cared.